Literature DB >> 21128266

Persistence of triclocarban and triclosan in soils after land application of biosolids and bioaccumulation in Eisenia foetida.

Christopher P Higgins1, Zachary J Paesani, Talia E Abbott Chalew, Rolf U Halden, Lakhwinder S Hundal.   

Abstract

The presence of the antimicrobial chemicals triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS) in municipal biosolids has raised concerns about the potential impacts of these chemicals on soil ecosystems following land application of municipal biosolids. The relative persistence of TCC and TCS in agricultural fields receiving yearly applications of biosolids at six different loading rates over a three-year period was investigated. Soil and biosolids samples were collected, extracted, and analyzed for TCC and TCS using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In addition, the potential for bioaccumulation of TCC and TCS from the biosolids-amended soils was assessed over 28 d in the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Standard 28-d bioaccumulation tests were conducted for three biosolids loading rates from two sites, representing agronomic and twice the agronomic rates of biosolids application plots as well as control plots receiving no applications of biosolids. Additional bioaccumulation kinetic data were collected for the soils receiving the high biosolids loadings to ensure attainment of quasi steady-state conditions. The results indicate that TCC is relatively more persistent in biosolids-amended soil than TCS. In addition, TCC bioaccumulated in E. foetida, reaching body burdens of 25 ± 4 and 133 ± 17 ng/g(ww) in worms exposed for 28 d to the two soils amended with biosolids at agronomic rates. The 28-d organic carbon and lipid-normalized biota soil accumulation factors (BSAFs) were calculated for TCC and ranged from 0.22 ± 0.12 to 0.71 ± 0.13. These findings suggest that TCC bioaccumulation is somewhat consistent with the traditional hydrophobic organic contaminant (HOC) partitioning paradigm. However, these data also suggest substantially reduced bioavailability of TCC in biosolids-amended soils compared with HOC partitioning theory.
Copyright © 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21128266      PMCID: PMC3034821          DOI: 10.1002/etc.416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  20 in total

1.  Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl-triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream.

Authors:  Melinda A Coogan; Regina E Edziyie; Thomas W La Point; Barney J Venables
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Rapid determination of total lipids in mosquitoes.

Authors:  E Van Handel
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Partitioning, persistence, and accumulation in digested sludge of the topical antiseptic triclocarban during wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Jochen Heidler; Amir Sapkota; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Mass balance assessment of triclosan removal during conventional sewage treatment.

Authors:  Jochen Heidler; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Investigation of triclosan fate and toxicity in continuous-flow activated sludge systems.

Authors:  Athanasios S Stasinakis; Anastasios V Petalas; Daniel Mamais; Nikolaos S Thomaidis; Georgia Gatidou; Themistokles D Lekkas
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Triclocarban, triclosan, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and 4-nonylphenol in biosolids and in soil receiving 33-year biosolids application.

Authors:  Kang Xia; Lakhwinder S Hundal; Kuldip Kumar; Kevin Armbrust; Albert E Cox; Thomas C Granato
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Fate and effects of triclosan in activated sludge.

Authors:  Thomas W Federle; Sandra K Kaiser; Barbara A Nuck
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Environmental fate of Triclosan in the River Aire Basin, UK.

Authors:  Darius Sabaliunas; Simon F Webb; Armin Hauk; Martin Jacob; William S Eckhoff
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Occurrence of methyl triclosan, a transformation product of the bactericide triclosan, in fish from various lakes in Switzerland.

Authors:  Marianne E Balmer; Thomas Poiger; Christian Droz; Kathrin Romanin; Per-Anders Bergqvist; Markus D Müller; Hans-Rudolf Buser
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Overexpression of marA, soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L M McMurry; M Oethinger; S B Levy
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  11 in total

1.  Activated carbon as a means of limiting bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides, triclosan, triclocarban, and fipronil from sediments rich in organic matter.

Authors:  Viet D Dang; Kevin J Kroll; Samuel D Supowit; Rolf U Halden; Nancy D Denslow
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Ecotoxicological assessment of perchlorate using in vitro and in vivo assays.

Authors:  Rosa Acevedo-Barrios; Consuelo Sabater-Marco; Jesus Olivero-Verbel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Immunotoxic effects of triclosan in the clam Ruditapes philippinarum.

Authors:  Valerio Matozzo; Andrea Costa Devoti; Maria Gabriella Marin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Fate of triclocarban in agricultural soils after biosolid applications.

Authors:  Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Biochemical and life cycle effects of triclosan chronic toxicity to earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Jurate Zaltauskaite; Diana Miskelyte
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Triclosan in water, implications for human and environmental health.

Authors:  L W B Olaniyan; N Mkwetshana; A I Okoh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden; Avery E Lindeman; Allison E Aiello; David Andrews; William A Arnold; Patricia Fair; Rebecca E Fuoco; Laura A Geer; Paula I Johnson; Rainer Lohmann; Kristopher McNeill; Victoria P Sacks; Ted Schettler; Roland Weber; R Thomas Zoeller; Arlene Blum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  A Review on the Fate of Legacy and Alternative Antimicrobials and Their Metabolites during Wastewater and Sludge Treatment.

Authors:  Timothy Abbott; Gokce Kor-Bicakci; Mohammad S Islam; Cigdem Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Pipe Dreams: Tapping into the Health Information in Our Sewers.

Authors:  Carrie Arnold
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.