BACKGROUND: The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) uses a point scale (maximal score of 9) to evaluate weight loss, complications, improvement in medical conditions, and quality of life among postoperative bariatric patients. The BAROS was originally developed to address the need for a standardized method of reporting open gastric bypass outcomes and has been shown to be both valid and reliable. BAROS scores >7 are considered "excellent." Our objective was to assess the overall BAROS scores in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at each postoperative follow-up interval and to examine the effect of age and gender on BAROS scores. METHODS: A total of 700 patients who had undergone LRYGB were asked to complete a BAROS questionnaire at their postoperative visits. The BAROS scores were recorded in a prospective database. The patients were stratified by their initial age and body mass index. The statistical analysis included analysis of variance. P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean BAROS score peaked at 7.29 at the 18-month appointment. More than one half of the patients presenting for follow-up visits at 12, 18, 24, and 36 months had BAROS scores in the "excellent" range. Age stratification (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and ≥ 50 years) resulted in significant differences at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. When stratified by the initial body mass index, differences were seen at 3 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with a lower initial body mass index had greater BAROS scores at many of the follow-up intervals. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass effectively improved the overall health and quality of life of patients. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) uses a point scale (maximal score of 9) to evaluate weight loss, complications, improvement in medical conditions, and quality of life among postoperative bariatric patients. The BAROS was originally developed to address the need for a standardized method of reporting open gastric bypass outcomes and has been shown to be both valid and reliable. BAROS scores >7 are considered "excellent." Our objective was to assess the overall BAROS scores in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at each postoperative follow-up interval and to examine the effect of age and gender on BAROS scores. METHODS: A total of 700 patients who had undergone LRYGB were asked to complete a BAROS questionnaire at their postoperative visits. The BAROS scores were recorded in a prospective database. The patients were stratified by their initial age and body mass index. The statistical analysis included analysis of variance. P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean BAROS score peaked at 7.29 at the 18-month appointment. More than one half of the patients presenting for follow-up visits at 12, 18, 24, and 36 months had BAROS scores in the "excellent" range. Age stratification (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and ≥ 50 years) resulted in significant differences at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. When stratified by the initial body mass index, differences were seen at 3 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION:Patients with a lower initial body mass index had greater BAROS scores at many of the follow-up intervals. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass effectively improved the overall health and quality of life of patients. Copyright Â
Authors: Piotr Major; Maciej Matłok; Michał Pędziwiatr; Marcin Migaczewski; Piotr Budzyński; Maciej Stanek; Michał Kisielewski; Michał Natkaniec; Andrzej Budzyński Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Sérgio Silveira-Júnior; Maurício Mendes de Albuquerque; Ricardo Reis do Nascimento; Luisa Salvagni da Rosa; Daniel de Andrade Hygidio; Raphaela Mazon Zapelini Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig Date: 2015
Authors: Cristina Fiorani; Sophie R Coles; Myutan Kulendran; Emma Rose McGlone; Marcus Reddy; Omar A Khan Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Emmeline Flor Ribeiro; Renato Ivan de Ávila; Rosineide Ribeiro de Sousa Santos; Clévia Ferreira Duarte Garrote Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-19