BACKGROUND: The ideal provocative maneuver in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a subject of ongoing investigation. Standing is a fundamental activity of daily life. This study examined acquisition of standing, Valsalva, and post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract gradients in HCM. METHODS: Rest supine, standing, and post-Valsalva gradients were measured in 98 consecutive patients with HCM who were referred for outpatient echocardiography. In 53 (54%) of the 98 patients, symptom-limited treadmill exercise was also performed, with gradients measured immediately after in the supine position. RESULTS: Fifty-six (57%) of the 98 patients had resting gradient<30 mm Hg and would thus be characterized as nonobstructive at rest. In the 98 patients, median gradients were 25 mm Hg at rest (range 0-205 mm Hg), increasing to 44 mm Hg after standing (range 0-309 mm Hg), an increase of 76%, and were again higher after Valsalva, 64 mm Hg (range 0-256 mm Hg) (P<.001). In the 53 patients who had gradient assessed after exercise, they were higher still, 100 mm Hg (range 0-256 mm Hg) (P<.001). In 29 patients (30%), standing provoked a higher gradient than Valsalva. CONCLUSION: Although standing increased gradients by 76%, it is not as potent a provocative maneuver as Valsalva or treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, standing is recommended as a physiologic provocative maneuver. In some patients standing may guide therapy; in others, the standing and exercise gradient provide a correct appreciation of the range of physiologically experienced gradients during daily upright activity.
BACKGROUND: The ideal provocative maneuver in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a subject of ongoing investigation. Standing is a fundamental activity of daily life. This study examined acquisition of standing, Valsalva, and post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract gradients in HCM. METHODS: Rest supine, standing, and post-Valsalva gradients were measured in 98 consecutive patients with HCM who were referred for outpatient echocardiography. In 53 (54%) of the 98 patients, symptom-limited treadmill exercise was also performed, with gradients measured immediately after in the supine position. RESULTS: Fifty-six (57%) of the 98 patients had resting gradient<30 mm Hg and would thus be characterized as nonobstructive at rest. In the 98 patients, median gradients were 25 mm Hg at rest (range 0-205 mm Hg), increasing to 44 mm Hg after standing (range 0-309 mm Hg), an increase of 76%, and were again higher after Valsalva, 64 mm Hg (range 0-256 mm Hg) (P<.001). In the 53 patients who had gradient assessed after exercise, they were higher still, 100 mm Hg (range 0-256 mm Hg) (P<.001). In 29 patients (30%), standing provoked a higher gradient than Valsalva. CONCLUSION: Although standing increased gradients by 76%, it is not as potent a provocative maneuver as Valsalva or treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, standing is recommended as a physiologic provocative maneuver. In some patients standing may guide therapy; in others, the standing and exercise gradient provide a correct appreciation of the range of physiologically experienced gradients during daily upright activity.