Literature DB >> 21126529

Partitioning the components of visuomotor adaptation to prism-altered distance.

Anne-Emmanuelle Priot1, Rafael Laboissière, Justin Plantier, Claude Prablanc, Corinne Roumes.   

Abstract

While the mechanisms of short-term adaptation to prism-altered apparent visual direction have been widely investigated, the processes underlying adaptation to prism-altered perceived distance are less well known. This study used a hand-pointing paradigm and exposure with base-out prisms to evaluate the relative contributions of sensory (visual and proprioceptive) and motor components of adaptation to perceived-distance alteration. A main experiment was designed to elicit adaptation at the sensory and motor levels, by giving subjects altered visual feedback. A control experiment without visual feedback allowed the effects of eye muscle potentiation (EMP) induced by sustained fixation through the prisms to be uncovered. In the main experiment, the aftereffects were partitioned into two-thirds visual and one-third motor, with no significant proprioceptive component. These results differ from the classical pattern of short-term adaptation to prism-altered apparent visual direction, which includes mainly proprioceptive/motor adaptive components, with a smaller visual component. This difference can be attributed to differences in accuracy between proprioception and vision for localization in depth or in lateral directions. In addition, a comparison of the visual aftereffects in the main and control experiments revealed two sub-components with equal contributions: a recalibration of the mapping between the vergence signal and perceived distance, and an EMP-related aftereffect. These findings indicate that "visual" adaptation actually involves a multiplicity of processes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126529     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  3 in total

1.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Claude Prablanc; Damien Laurent; Yves Rossetti; Anne-Emmanuelle Priot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Temporally stable adaptation is robust, incomplete and specific.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Krista E Overvliet; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.