Literature DB >> 21126120

Anaesthesia preference, neuraxial vs general, and outcome after caesarean section.

A Fassoulaki1, C Staikou, A Melemeni, G Kottis, G Petropoulos.   

Abstract

We investigated parturients' preference for neuraxial vs general anaesthesia, while they have experienced both techniques in the past. A total of 102 parturients who underwent elective caesarean section under general or neuraxial anaesthesia at different times completed a questionnaire comparing the two techniques. According to our results, 98% vs 51% (p < 0.001) of the women saw the baby and 51% vs 29% (p = 0.003) ambulated in the neuraxial and general anaesthesia groups, respectively, within the first 24 h postoperatively. Neuraxial anaesthesia was associated with less pain assessed by the Verbal Analogue Scale (VAS) (54 ± 21 vs 72 ± 20 p < 0.001), fewer days of hospital stay (4 ± 0.5 vs 5 ± 1.5, p = 0.001) and higher satisfaction scores (77 ± 18 vs 52 ± 24, p = 0.001) vs general anaesthesia. Finally, 80% of the women would choose neuraxial anaesthesia for a future caesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126120     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2010.518650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Leg Wrapping for the Prevention of Postspinal Hypotension in Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Aparna Abhijit Bagle; Adithya Vishnu; Anil Kumar; Amit Malik; Vinit Garg; Gayatri Khanvilkar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

2.  Maternal Satisfaction and Its Associated Factors towards Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Eritrean Hospitals.

Authors:  Idris Mohammed Idris; Ghidey Gebreyohanns Weldegiorgis; Eyasu Habte Tesfamariam
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-03-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.