Literature DB >> 2112610

Two slow stages in refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B are due to proline isomerization.

G V Semisotnov1, V N Uversky, I V Sokolovsky, A M Gutin, O I Razgulyaev, N A Rodionova.   

Abstract

Kinetics of refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B have been studied by the "double-jump" technique (i.e. the dependence of protein refolding on delay time in the unfolded state after fast unfolding). It is shown that two stages (the slow with a relaxation time of t1/2 approximately equal to 120 s and the superslow with t1/2 approximately equal to 600 s) observed during refolding of bovine carbonic anhydrase B are due to trans-cis isomerization of proline residues. The dependences of rate constants of these processes on temperature and on the final denaturant concentration were measured. Activation energies of both processes are the same, Ea = 18(+/- 2) kcal/mol. The rate constants of protein refolding do not depend on the final concentration of urea under native conditions. In addition, the rate of isomerization of essential proline residues in the "molten globule" intermediate state of bovine carbonic anhydrase was measured and found to be equal to that for unstructural polypeptides. The effect of several proline residues on carbonic anhydrase refolding is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2112610     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80215-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  6 in total

Review 1.  Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Vijay M Krishnamurthy; George K Kaufman; Adam R Urbach; Irina Gitlin; Katherine L Gudiksen; Douglas B Weibel; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Control of aggregation in protein refolding: a variety of surfactants promote renaturation of carbonic anhydrase II.

Authors:  D B Wetlaufer; Y Xie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Proline inhibits aggregation during protein refolding.

Authors:  D Samuel; T K Kumar; G Ganesh; G Jayaraman; P W Yang; M M Chang; V D Trivedi; S L Wang; K C Hwang; D K Chang; C Yu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Control of aggregation in protein refolding: the temperature-leap tactic.

Authors:  Y Xie; D B Wetlaufer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Increasing the net charge and decreasing the hydrophobicity of bovine carbonic anhydrase decreases the rate of denaturation with sodium dodecyl sulfate.

Authors:  Katherine L Gudiksen; Irina Gitlin; Demetri T Moustakas; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Experimental approach to study the effect of mutations on the protein folding pathway.

Authors:  Elena V Nemtseva; Marina A Gerasimova; Tatiana N Melnik; Bogdan S Melnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.