N Kianmehr1, M Mofidi, H Rahmani, Y Shahin. 1. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Rasool Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contrary to international guidelines recommending family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), allowing family members to be present remains a matter of debate in many countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of healthcare providers from a Muslim setting concerning family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR). METHODS: The sample population consisted of CPR responders in four teaching hospitals in Tehran. These centres have no policy regarding the presence of family members during resuscitation. We developed and circulated a questionnaire gathering opinions, and collated their comments. RESULTS: From 200 respondents, 77% opposed FWR. We found that gender, age, experience, previous exposure to FWR or specialty (except for emergency physicians) did not predict opinion towards family presence during CPR. The most common reasons given for opposition to family presence were fear of psychological trauma to family members, possible interference with patient care/decision-making, and a perceived increase in staff stress. CONCLUSION: In a largely Muslim community, and contrary to general guidelines, our survey suggested that the majority of CPR responders do not favour the presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Any counter to this opinion would need to be based on educating team members about the possible benefits of relatives being present during resuscitation. Public education surrounding CPR would also be a fundamental element for implementing any formal programme encouraging family-witnessed CPR in hospitals such as ours.
BACKGROUND: Contrary to international guidelines recommending family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), allowing family members to be present remains a matter of debate in many countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of healthcare providers from a Muslim setting concerning family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR). METHODS: The sample population consisted of CPR responders in four teaching hospitals in Tehran. These centres have no policy regarding the presence of family members during resuscitation. We developed and circulated a questionnaire gathering opinions, and collated their comments. RESULTS: From 200 respondents, 77% opposed FWR. We found that gender, age, experience, previous exposure to FWR or specialty (except for emergency physicians) did not predict opinion towards family presence during CPR. The most common reasons given for opposition to family presence were fear of psychological trauma to family members, possible interference with patient care/decision-making, and a perceived increase in staff stress. CONCLUSION: In a largely Muslim community, and contrary to general guidelines, our survey suggested that the majority of CPR responders do not favour the presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Any counter to this opinion would need to be based on educating team members about the possible benefits of relatives being present during resuscitation. Public education surrounding CPR would also be a fundamental element for implementing any formal programme encouraging family-witnessed CPR in hospitals such as ours.
Authors: Arezoo Ghavi; Hadi Hassankhani; Kelly Powers; Mohammad Arshadi-Bostanabad; Hossein Namdar Areshtanab; Mohammad Heidarzadeh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Michelle Olding; Sarah E McMillan; Scott Reeves; Madeline H Schmitt; Kathleen Puntillo; Simon Kitto Journal: Health Expect Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Feras H Abuzeyad; Ahmed Elhobi; Wael Kamkoum; Luma Bashmi; Ghada Al-Qasim; Leena Alqasem; Naser Mohamed Ali Mansoor; Stephanie Hsu; Priya Das Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-31