Literature DB >> 2112494

Failure of body mass index or body weight to influence markedly the response to ovarian hyperstimulation in normal cycling women.

C G Lewis1, G M Warnes, X J Wang, C D Matthews.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis was performed of 368 normally cycling women treated with a single cycle of a standard ovarian hyperstimulation regime (CC 100 mg days 5 to 9 and hMG 150 IU days 6, 8, and 10) associated with either an IVF or GIFT program. Neither the peak serum E2 level attained nor the number of days of stimulation required bore a relationship to the BMI or the total body weight of these women. Whereas the mean number of oocytes aspirated from women with BMI less than 19.1 was higher (6.4 +/- 3.2) compared with obese women (BMI greater than 27.6, 4.8 +/- 2.6), the rate of fertilization was not different for both BMI extremes. It is concluded that factors other than BMI or total body weight have more important influences on the response to hyperstimulation in normal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2112494     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53594-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Increased body mass index has a deleterious effect on in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  J B Loveland; H D McClamrock; A M Malinow; F I Sharara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Impact of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcomes.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Catherine Lee Kodama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Body mass index, follicle-stimulating hormone and their predictive value in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Kathrin Ferlitsch; Michael O Sator; Doris M Gruber; Ernst Rücklinger; Christian J Gruber; Johannes C Huber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Does body mass index of infertile women have an impact on IVF procedure and outcome?

Authors:  C Wittemer; J Ohl; M Bailly; K Bettahar-Lebugle; I Nisand
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Body mass index and short-term weight change in relation to treatment outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Jorge E Chavarro; Shelley Ehrlich; Daniela S Colaci; Diane L Wright; Thomas L Toth; John C Petrozza; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Clinical efficacy of body mass index as predictor of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes.

Authors:  Seung Yup Ku; Sang Don Kim; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Young Min Choi; Jung Gu Kim; Shin Yong Moon; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Overweight and obesity adversely affect outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies in polycystic ovary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Zhiqin Bu; Wei Dai; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Jun Zhai; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-10-25

8.  Body mass index impacts in vitro fertilization stimulation.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Steve Hong; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10-27

9.  Effect of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcomes in women.

Authors:  Anjali Sathya; Sathya Balasubramanyam; Shalu Gupta; Thankam Verma
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-09

10.  The influence of obesity on incidence of complications in patients hospitalized with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  Rachel S Mandelbaum; Liat Bainvoll; Caroline J Violette; Meghan B Smith; Shinya Matsuzaki; Maximilian Klar; Jacqueline R Ho; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.