Literature DB >> 21124634

Low-Temperature Preparation of Superparamagnetic CoFe(2)O(4) Microspheres with High Saturation Magnetization.

Hong Lei Yuan1, Yong Qiang Wang, Shao Min Zhou, Li Sheng Liu, Xi Liang Chen, Shi Yun Lou, Rui Jian Yuan, Yao Ming Hao, Ning Li.   

Abstract

Based on a low-temperature route, monodispersed CoFe(2)O(4) microspheres (MSs) were fabricated through aggregation of primary nanoparticles. The microstructural and magnetic characteristics of the as-prepared MSs were characterized by X-ray diffraction/photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning/transmitting electron microscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometer. The results indicate that the diameters of CoFe(2)O(4) MSs with narrow size distribution can be tuned from over 200 to ~330 nm. Magnetic measurements reveal these MSs exhibit superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature with high saturation magnetization. Furthermore, the mechanism of formation of the monodispersed CoFe(2)O(4) MSs was discussed on the basis of time-dependent experiments, in which hydrophilic PVP plays a crucial role.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21124634      PMCID: PMC2964483          DOI: 10.1007/s11671-010-9718-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett        ISSN: 1556-276X            Impact factor:   4.703


Introduction

Over the past decades, superparamagnetic (SP) nanostructures of spinel ferrites (MFe2O4: M = Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, etc.) have drawn intense scientific and technological interests because they possess a wide range of applications in magnetic fluid [1-3], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [4,5], and drug delivery technology [6-8]. Recently, spinel cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanostructure materials have been extensively studied because they form a magnetic system which is an ideal candidate toward understanding and controlling magnetic properties at the atomic level through chemical manipulation [9]. Based on different techniques, SP CoFe2O4 nano-scale particles have been synthesized by several research groups [10-13]. Unfortunately, these small nanoparticles, especially those with sizes below 10 nm, have poor magnetic response abilities [14]. The low magnetization properties caused by small size limit their usage in a number of practical applications since they cannot be effectively manipulated by using moderate magnetic fields [15,16]. In order to obtain a high saturation magnetization (Ms), simply making particles larger cannot be an option at all, resulting in a strong aggregation due to the non-SP ferromagnetic attraction [17]. Recently, much effort has been focused on the preparation of large-size SP particles with high Ms using simple composites [18,19]. For example, Lee et al. [18] reported the fabrication of highly uniform SP mesoporous spheres with sub-micrometer scale, composed of silica and CoFe2O4 achieved a high magnetization value. Similar efforts were done by Bao et al. [19] in which controlled growth of SP nanostructures of spherical and rod-like CoFe2O4 nanocrystals. However, their high Ms required a high reaction temperature and expensive high-boiling point toxic solvents, which are disadvantages for their biological applicability. Moreover, such composite nanostructures are incompatible with low expense of preparing procedure. Herein, we report a single-step process for high-performance monodisperse SP CoFe2O4 MSs at low temperature (at only 180°C). As a consequence of the low-temperature synthesis, the as-obtained samples possess a high Ms (over 55 emu/g) and biocompatibility.

Experimental Section

Cobalt acetate [Co(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O], anhydrous ethanol(CH3CH2OH), iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate [Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O], and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, K30) are of analytic grade reagents and purchased without further treatment. In a typical reaction, 2 mmol Co(CH3COO)2 · 4H2O and 4 mmol Fe(NO3)3 · 9H2O were dissolved in 35 mL CH3CH2OH forming a reddish brown solution, after which 0.2 g PVP was added. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 min and then sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (50 mL capacity). The autoclave was heated to and maintained at 180°C for 12–24 h and then was allowed to cool to room temperature. The dark products were subjected to magnetic decantation, followed by repeated washing with distilled water, ethanol, and acetone. The final products were dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 8 h. Phase and composition analyses of the products were performed by X-ray diffraction/photoelectron spectroscopy [XRD/XPS (Philips X Pert Prodiffractometer with Cu Kα (λ = 1.54056 Å) radiation)/(AXIS ULTRA XPS, Al Kα)]. The size and morphology of the as-synthesized MSs were investigated by using scanning/transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM, JSM5600LV/JEOL100CX-II). The magnetic measurements were carried out by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM).

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows a typical XRD pattern of the as-fabricated sample (reaction for 24 h). All diffraction peaks can be indexed to a simple cubic lattice (FCC), and the positions along with relative intensity of peaks match well with standard CoFe2O4 powder diffraction database (JCPDS File No. 22-1086), indicating that the as-obtained products have an Fd3m cubic spinel structure. According to the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite size which is calculated based on the XRD pattern (311) is approximately 8 nm. In fact, the XRD patterns of the others (reaction for 12 and 36 h) are similar to it (not shown). More accurately, XPS was used to determine its composition. Figure 1b and 1c show the high-resolution XPS spectra of 2p Co and Fe, respectively. The peak at 780.8 eV is from Co2p3/2, with a shake up satellite at 785.9 eV, while the peak at 797.2 eV is caused by Co2p1/2, with a satellite peak at 803.0 eV. The presence of those two peaks and the highly intense satellites near them is consistent with the presence of Co2+ in the high-spin state. All the Fe2p spectra generally show a main peak at a binding energy (BE) of around 710.3 eV, accompanied by a satellite line visible at a BE of around 718.3 eV, only indicative of the presence of Fe3+ cations. Further quantitative analysis finds that the atomic ratio between Co and Fe is about 1:2, which is compatible with the data of XRD.
Figure 1

The as-synthesized CoFe2O4 MSs for a XRD pattern, and XPS spectra b Co2p and c Fe2p

The as-synthesized CoFe2O4 MSs for a XRD pattern, and XPS spectra b Co2p and c Fe2p The SEM images of the as-synthesized samples obtained at different reaction times are illustrated in Fig. 2a and 2b. It is clear that both of the products have uniform spherical shapes. The average size of the CoFe2O4 MSs is ~220 nm [solvothermal treated for 12 h (Fig. 2a)]. However, when extending the reaction time to 24 h, the average size increases to ~330 nm (as revealed in Fig. 2b). As shown in the corresponding TEM images in Fig. 2c and 2d, these micrometer-sized CoFe2O4 spheres [~220 nm (Fig. 2c) and ~330 nm (Fig. 2d) in diameter, respectively] can clearly be seen. Additionally, an individual sphere is not a single microparticle but the assemblies of small CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (the diameter of ~8 nm), in which the size of primary nanoparticles is in excellent agreement with the XRD results.
Figure 2

SEM/TEM images of products prepared at different reaction time: a/c 12 h, b/d 24 h

SEM/TEM images of products prepared at different reaction time: a/c 12 h, b/d 24 h To obtain a better understanding of the formation and evolution of CoFe2O4 MSs along with the reaction time, that the reaction duration was further extended to 36 h was carried out. The MSs were evacuated resulting in octahedral-shaped CoFe2O4 particles, which are confirmed by the SEM image (Fig. 3a) and TEM image (Fig. 3b). As a consequence, a proposed mechanism of formation and evolution of the CoFe2O4 MSs is sketched in Fig. 4. It is well known that PVP can selectively absorb on a certain crystal facet of the as-prepared primary building blocks such as nanoparticles, nanosheets, nanoplates, nanorods, and so on [20-23]. In our experimental system, PVP surfactant contributes not only to preventing these primary building blocks from entropy-driven random aggregation but also to controlling the formation of the regular geometry. The formation and evolution of MSs seems to be as follows: at first, this CoFe2O4 phase undergoes consequent nucleation and growth around the entire surface stabilized by PVP. In the subsequent process, driven by the minimization of the total energy of the system, the small primary CoFe2O4 nanoparticles aggregated together to form three-dimensional (3D) spheres. Ostwald ripening occurred under solvothermal conditions, resulting in the formation of CoFe2O4 spheres from small grows into larger due to isotropic growth. The octahedral shape of the product obtained by reaction for 36 h may be explained by combination of thermodynamic aspects of crystal growth and the selective adsorption model of surfactants on different crystallographic facets [24,25]. Moreover, the structures may be deduced that development of the (111) facets was handicapped by the adsorbed PVP surfactant on these facets. Of course, convincing explanation on the mechanism of MSs is our further work.
Figure 3

a SEM/b TEM images of studied samples with 36 h reaction time

Figure 4

Schematic illustration of the formation and evolution of CoFe2O4 MSs along with the reaction time

a SEM/b TEM images of studied samples with 36 h reaction time Schematic illustration of the formation and evolution of CoFe2O4 MSs along with the reaction time The magnetic behavior of CoFe2O4 MSs is very important for practical applications. The room-temperature magnetization curves (Fig. 5a, 5b) display the two relatively high Ms values of 41.2 (taken from 220 nm) and 55.2 emu/g (330 nm), respectively. Both values are, however, somewhat lower than the bulk value (71.2 emu/g) [18,19]. The hysteresis loop shows essentially no coercivity (HC) for the smaller size samples (220 nm) and negligible value of 27 Oe (larger size specimens, a diameter of 330 nm), suggesting that improved coalescence of the crystallites in the nanostructures results in increased magnetic coupling and higher magnetization. According to the results of XRD and TEM observations, the average size of primary crystals is about 8 nm, smaller than the SP critical size of CoFe2O4[26,27]. So it is reasonable that the self-assembled cobalt ferrite MSs reveal SP behavior even though their sphere size exceeds 200 nm. The stabilization of the MSs in distilled water thanks to the surfaces capped of hydrophilic PVP. Slight agitation can bring the MSs to back into the aqueous solution when the magnet is removed (Fig. 5c) although these magnetic MSs can be completely separated from the solution when the solution is subjected to an external magnetic field within minutes, as shown in Fig. 5d. It can be obviously seen that the CoFe2O4 MSs have rapid magnetic response ability at room temperature, as well as, highly monodispersed, and biocompatible.
Figure 5

RT magnetization curves for the of CoFe2O4 MSs with different reaction time: a 12 h, b 24 h (The inset shows enlarged magnetic hysteresis loops at low applied fields); photographs of CoFe2O4 MSs dispersion in a vial, c without magnetic field, d with magnetic field for 1 min

RT magnetization curves for the of CoFe2O4 MSs with different reaction time: a 12 h, b 24 h (The inset shows enlarged magnetic hysteresis loops at low applied fields); photographs of CoFe2O4 MSs dispersion in a vial, c without magnetic field, d with magnetic field for 1 min

Conclusion

In summary, SP CoFe2O4 MSs have been synthesized through a simple surfactants-assisted solvothermal method at a relatively low temperature. All of the reactants are common reagents and inexpensive, as well as environment benign. The as-prepared MSs, composed of about 8-nm CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, have uniform sizes (diameters up to several hundred nanometers), high Ms and well water-dispersible make them good candidates for not only in advanced magnetic materials and ferrofluid technology, but also in biomedical fields such as biomolecular separations, targeted drug delivery, as well as magnetic resonance imaging.
  13 in total

1.  Size-selective chemical synthesis of tartrate stabilized cobalt ferrite ionic magnetic fluid.

Authors:  S Neveu; A Bee; M Robineau; D Talbot
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 8.128

2.  Metastable gamma-MnS hierarchical architectures: synthesis, characterization, and growth mechanism.

Authors:  Yuanhui Zheng; Yao Cheng; Yuansheng Wang; Lihua Zhou; Feng Bao; Chong Jia
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Dynamic susceptibility evidence of surface spin freezing in ultrafine NiFe2O4 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ronald J Tackett; Abdul W Bhuiya; Cristian E Botez
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Alternating Magnetic Field Controlled, Multifunctional Nano-Reservoirs: Intracellular Uptake and Improved Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Santaneel Ghosh; Somesree Ghoshmitra; Tong Cai; David R Diercks; Nathaniel C Mills; Dianna L Hynds
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  One-Step UV-Induced Synthesis of Polypyrrole/Ag Nanocomposites at the Water/Ionic Liquid Interface.

Authors:  Yuyan Wei; Liang Li; Xiaoming Yang; Guoliang Pan; Guoping Yan; Xianghua Yu
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.703

6.  First-Principles Study of Magnetic Properties of 3d Transition Metals Doped in ZnO Nanowires.

Authors:  Hongliang Shi; Yifeng Duan
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.703

7.  Synthesis and Characterization of Monodispersed Copper Colloids in Polar Solvents.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Huaqing Xie; Lifei Chen; Yang Li; Chen Zhang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.703

8.  Controlled growth of monodisperse self-supported superparamagnetic nanostructures of spherical and rod-like CoFe2O4 nanocrystals.

Authors:  Ningzhong Bao; Liming Shen; Yu-Hsiang A Wang; Jianxing Ma; Dipanjan Mazumdar; Arunava Gupta
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Single step synthesis of high-purity CoO nanocrystals.

Authors:  Huaming Yang; Jing Ouyang; Aidong Tang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shouheng Sun; Hao Zeng; David B Robinson; Simone Raoux; Philip M Rice; Shan X Wang; Guanxiong Li
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  7 in total

1.  Wet chemical synthesis and magnetic properties of single crystal Co nanochains with surface amorphous passivation Co layers.

Authors:  Shao-Min Zhou; Shi-Yun Lou; Yong-Qiang Wang; Xi-Liang Chen; Li-Sheng Liu; Hong-Lei Yuan
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.703

2.  Morphological evolution, growth mechanism, and magneto-transport properties of silver telluride one-dimensional nanostructures.

Authors:  Gaomin Li; Xiaobing Tang; Shaomin Zhou; Ning Li; Xianyou Yuan
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.703

3.  In situ single cell detection via microfluidic magnetic bead assay.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Pawan Kc; Ge Zhang; Jiang Zhe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Toxicity of PEG-Coated CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles with Treatment Effect of Curcumin.

Authors:  Shahnaz Akhtar; Wenzhen An; Xiaoying Niu; Kang Li; Shahzad Anwar; Khan Maaz; Muhammad Maqbool; Lan Gao
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  Chemical Solution Deposition of Ordered 2D Arrays of Room-Temperature Ferrimagnetic Cobalt Ferrite Nanodots.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Justin Varghese; Giuseppe Portale; Alessandro Longo; Jamo Momand; Ali Syari'ati; Jeroen A Heuver; Petra Rudolf; Bart J Kooi; Beatriz Noheda; Katja Loos
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  A Comparative Study of the Toxicity of Polyethylene Glycol-Coated Cobalt Ferrite Nanospheres and Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shahnaz Akhtar; Qasim Khan; Shahzad Anwar; Ghafar Ali; Muhammad Maqbool; Maaz Khan; Shafqat Karim; Lan Gao
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.703

7.  Dual stimuli-responsive Fe3O4 graft poly(acrylic acid)-block-poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl ferrocenecarboxylate) copolymer micromicelles: surface RAFT synthesis, self-assembly and drug release applications.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Xue-Yin Zhang; Yan-Ling Luo; Feng Xu; Ya-Shao Chen; Yu-Yu Su
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 10.435

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.