AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intermittent warm (IWC) versus intermittent cold blood cardioplegia (ICC) in high-risk patients that require prolonged periods of aortic cross-clamping during on-pump cardiac surgery. METHODS: From 3527 consecutive patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, 520 patients were retrospectively identified that required prolonged aortic cross-clamp ≥ 75 min. Myocardial protection was performed with ICC (N.=280) or IWC (N.=240). Groups were compared regarding clinical outcomes, myocardial injury (CK-MB, cTnT) and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of applied cardioplegia on 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiac death, perioperative myocardial injury (PM) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Demographic data, mean logistic Euroscore, aortic-cross-clamping and CPB time were comparable between groups. Patients with ICC needed more intraoperative defibrillations, had more postoperative blood transfusions and a prolonged hospital stay when compared to the IWC-group (P < 0.05). Thirty-day all-cause mortality tended to be higher in IWC (11% vs. 6%; P = 0.083) with significantly higher cardiac mortality (9% vs. 4%; P=0.015) compared to ICC. Myocardial injury was more pronounced in the IWC-group with a higher incidence of PMI (IWC: 17% vs. ICC:6%; P < 0.05) and MACE (IWC:37% vs. ICC:25%; P < 0.05). Groups did not differ regarding other postoperative clinical outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed IWC to be independently predictive (P < 0.05) for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR:2.42; 95% CI:1.04-5.05), cardiac death (OR:3.57; 95% CI:1.49-8.85), MACE (OR:1.87; 95% CI:1.22-2.87) and PMI (OR:3.46; 95% CI:1.86-6.41). CONCLUSION: ICC results in less myocardial damage and reduced postoperative cardiac mortality and morbidity in patients requiring extended periods of aortic-cross-clamping during on-pump cardiac surgery, suggesting superior cardioprotection when compared to IWC.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intermittent warm (IWC) versus intermittent cold blood cardioplegia (ICC) in high-risk patients that require prolonged periods of aortic cross-clamping during on-pump cardiac surgery. METHODS: From 3527 consecutive patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, 520 patients were retrospectively identified that required prolonged aortic cross-clamp ≥ 75 min. Myocardial protection was performed with ICC (N.=280) or IWC (N.=240). Groups were compared regarding clinical outcomes, myocardial injury (CK-MB, cTnT) and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of applied cardioplegia on 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiac death, perioperative myocardial injury (PM) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Demographic data, mean logistic Euroscore, aortic-cross-clamping and CPB time were comparable between groups. Patients with ICC needed more intraoperative defibrillations, had more postoperative blood transfusions and a prolonged hospital stay when compared to the IWC-group (P < 0.05). Thirty-day all-cause mortality tended to be higher in IWC (11% vs. 6%; P = 0.083) with significantly higher cardiac mortality (9% vs. 4%; P=0.015) compared to ICC. Myocardial injury was more pronounced in the IWC-group with a higher incidence of PMI (IWC: 17% vs. ICC:6%; P < 0.05) and MACE (IWC:37% vs. ICC:25%; P < 0.05). Groups did not differ regarding other postoperative clinical outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed IWC to be independently predictive (P < 0.05) for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR:2.42; 95% CI:1.04-5.05), cardiac death (OR:3.57; 95% CI:1.49-8.85), MACE (OR:1.87; 95% CI:1.22-2.87) and PMI (OR:3.46; 95% CI:1.86-6.41). CONCLUSION: ICC results in less myocardial damage and reduced postoperative cardiac mortality and morbidity in patients requiring extended periods of aortic-cross-clamping during on-pump cardiac surgery, suggesting superior cardioprotection when compared to IWC.
Authors: Elmar W Kuhn; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Jung-Min Pyun; Klaus Neef; Oliver J Liakopoulos; Christof Stamm; Thorsten Wittwer; Thorsten Wahlers Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.411