OBJECTIVE: Differences in antiretroviral distribution into the central nervous system (CNS) may impact neurocognitive status. We assessed the relationship between estimates of antiretroviral therapy penetration into the CNS, using a published ranking system, and neurocognitive status in HIV-positive participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) suppression. DESIGN: Participants with at least 6 weeks ongoing antiretroviral drug use and vRNA less than 50 copies/ml (N = 2636; 83% male, median baseline CD4 T cells: 244 cells/μl) had at least one neuroscreen assessment [Trail Making Test, Part A and B; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Symbol] at 10 413 neurovisits. Neuroscreen test scores were demographically adjusted and converted to Z-scores (NPZ3: lower scores imply more impairment). Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE) ranks of 0.0 (low), 0.5 (medium), or 1.0 (high) were assigned to antiretrovirals and summed per regimen, per neurovisit. METHODS: Multivariate linear regression models using generalized estimating equations assessed NPZ3 scores with respect to antiretroviral regimen. Covariates were retained if P ≤ 0.1. RESULTS: A final model demonstrated that better NPZ3 scores were associated with higher CPE among participants taking more than three antiretroviral drugs (+0.07 per one unit increase in CPE score; P = 0.004) but not among participants with three or less antiretroviral drugs in the regimen (+0.01; P = 0.5). Results were adjusted for demographics, injection drug use, hepatitis C virus serostatus, CD4 cell count (current and nadir), baseline vRNA, antiretroviral experience, and years since first antiretroviral drug use. CONCLUSION: Use of antiretroviral drugs with better estimated CNS penetration may be associated with better neurocognitive functioning; some people may require more than three antiretroviral drugs to treat HIV in the CNS. Clinically this means antiretroviral regimens could be designed to optimize estimated CNS penetration without sacrificing virologic and immunologic benefits.
OBJECTIVE: Differences in antiretroviral distribution into the central nervous system (CNS) may impact neurocognitive status. We assessed the relationship between estimates of antiretroviral therapy penetration into the CNS, using a published ranking system, and neurocognitive status in HIV-positive participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) suppression. DESIGN:Participants with at least 6 weeks ongoing antiretroviral drug use and vRNA less than 50 copies/ml (N = 2636; 83% male, median baseline CD4 T cells: 244 cells/μl) had at least one neuroscreen assessment [Trail Making Test, Part A and B; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Digit Symbol] at 10 413 neurovisits. Neuroscreen test scores were demographically adjusted and converted to Z-scores (NPZ3: lower scores imply more impairment). Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE) ranks of 0.0 (low), 0.5 (medium), or 1.0 (high) were assigned to antiretrovirals and summed per regimen, per neurovisit. METHODS: Multivariate linear regression models using generalized estimating equations assessed NPZ3 scores with respect to antiretroviral regimen. Covariates were retained if P ≤ 0.1. RESULTS: A final model demonstrated that better NPZ3 scores were associated with higher CPE among participants taking more than three antiretroviral drugs (+0.07 per one unit increase in CPE score; P = 0.004) but not among participants with three or less antiretroviral drugs in the regimen (+0.01; P = 0.5). Results were adjusted for demographics, injection drug use, hepatitis C virus serostatus, CD4 cell count (current and nadir), baseline vRNA, antiretroviral experience, and years since first antiretroviral drug use. CONCLUSION: Use of antiretroviral drugs with better estimated CNS penetration may be associated with better neurocognitive functioning; some people may require more than three antiretroviral drugs to treat HIV in the CNS. Clinically this means antiretroviral regimens could be designed to optimize estimated CNS penetration without sacrificing virologic and immunologic benefits.
Authors: R J Ellis; A C Gamst; E Capparelli; S A Spector; K Hsia; T Wolfson; I Abramson; I Grant; J A McCutchan Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-02-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elizabeth Fox; Peter M Bungay; John Bacher; Cynthia L McCully; Robert L Dedrick; Frank M Balis Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: V Tozzi; P Balestra; R Murri; S Galgani; R Bellagamba; P Narciso; A Antinori; M Giulianelli; G Tosi; M Fantoni; A Sampaolesi; P Noto; G Ippolito; A W Wu Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Charles H Hinkin; David J Hardy; Karen I Mason; Steven A Castellon; Ramani S Durvasula; Mona N Lam; Marta Stefaniak Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: R K Heaton; R A Velin; J A McCutchan; S J Gulevich; J H Atkinson; M R Wallace; H P Godfrey; D A Kirson; I Grant Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1994 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Robert K Heaton; Thomas D Marcotte; Monica Rivera Mindt; Joseph Sadek; David J Moore; Heather Bentley; J Allen McCutchan; Carla Reicks; Igor Grant Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Scott L Letendre; J Allen McCutchan; Meredith E Childers; Steven P Woods; Deborah Lazzaretto; Robert K Heaton; Igor Grant; Ronald J Ellis Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Theodore D Ruel; Michael J Boivin; Hannah E Boal; Paul Bangirana; Edwin Charlebois; Diane V Havlir; Philip J Rosenthal; Grant Dorsey; Jane Achan; Carolyne Akello; Moses R Kamya; Joseph K Wong Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: David Croteau; Brookie M Best; Scott Letendre; Steven S Rossi; Ronald J Ellis; David B Clifford; Ann C Collier; Benjamin B Gelman; Justin C McArthur; John Allen McCutchan; Susan Morgello; Igor Grant Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Laurie M Baker; Robert H Paul; Jodi M Heaps-Woodruff; Jee Yoon Chang; Mario Ortega; Zachary Margolin; Christina Usher; Brian Basco; Sarah Cooley; Beau M Ances Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: N S Ku; Y Lee; J Y Ahn; J E Song; M H Kim; S B Kim; S J Jeong; K-W Hong; E Kim; S H Han; J Y Song; H J Cheong; Y G Song; W J Kim; J M Kim; D M Smith; J Y Choi Journal: HIV Med Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 3.180