Literature DB >> 21123111

Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324,168 participants from randomised trials.

Sripal Bangalore1, Sunil Kumar, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Harikrishna Makani, Ehud Grossman, Jørn Wetterslev, Ajay K Gupta, Peter S Sever, Christian Gluud, Franz H Messerli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of cancer from antihypertensive drugs has been much debated, with a recent analysis showing increased risk with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). We assessed the association between antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk in a comprehensive analysis of data from randomised clinical trials.
METHODS: We undertook traditional direct comparison meta-analyses, multiple comparisons (network) meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1950, to August, 2010, for randomised clinical trials of antihypertensive therapy (ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors [ACEi], β blockers, calcium-channel blockers [CCBs], or diuretics) with follow-up of at least 1 year. Our primary outcomes were cancer and cancer-related deaths.
FINDINGS: We identified 70 randomised controlled trials (148 comparator groups) with 324,168 participants. In the network meta-analysis (fixed-effect model), we recorded no difference in the risk of cancer with ARBs (proportion with cancer 2·04%; odds ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·93-1·09), ACEi (2·03%; 1·00, 0·92-1·09), β blockers (1·97%; 0·97, 0·88-1·07), CCBs (2·11%; 1·05, 0·96-1·13), diuretics (2·02%; 1·00, 0·90-1·11), or other controls (1·95%, 0·97, 0·74-1·24) versus placebo (2·02%). There was an increased risk with the combination of ACEi plus ARBs (2·30%, 1·14, 1·02-1·28); however, this risk was not apparent in the random-effects model (odds ratio 1·15, 95% CI 0·92-1·38). No differences were detected in cancer-related mortality for ARBs (death rate 1·33%; odds ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·87-1·15), ACEi (1·25%; 0·95, 0·81-1·10), β blockers (1·23%; 0·93, 0·80-1·08), CCBs (1·27%; 0·96, 0·82-1·11), diuretics (1·30%; 0·98, 0·84-1·13), other controls (1·43%; 1·08, 0·78-1·46), and ACEi plus ARBs (1·45%; 1·10, 0·90-1·32). In direct comparison meta-analyses, similar results were recorded for all antihypertensive classes, except for an increased risk of cancer with ACEi and ARB combination (OR 1·14, 95% CI 1·04-1·24; p=0·004) and with CCBs (1·06, 1·01-1·12; p=0·02). However, we noted no significant differences in cancer-related mortality. On the basis of trial sequential analysis, our results suggest no evidence of even a 5-10% relative risk (RR) increase of cancer and cancer-related deaths with any individual class of antihypertensive drugs studied. However, for the ACEi and ARB combination, the cumulative Z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary, suggesting firm evidence for at least a 10% RR increase in cancer risk.
INTERPRETATION: Our analysis refutes a 5·0-10·0% relative increase in the risk of cancer or cancer-related death with the use of ARBs, ACEi, β blockers, diuretics, and CCBs. However, increased risk of cancer with the combination of ACEi and ARBs cannot be ruled out. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123111     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  122 in total

1.  Prevention of skin carcinogenesis by the β-blocker carvedilol.

Authors:  Andy Chang; Steven Yeung; Arvind Thakkar; Kevin M Huang; Mandy M Liu; Rhye-Samuel Kanassatega; Cyrus Parsa; Robert Orlando; Edwin K Jackson; Bradley T Andresen; Ying Huang
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 2.  Angiotensin receptor blockers and tumorigenesis: something to be (or not to be) concerned about?

Authors:  Vadim Tchaikovski; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Role of RAAS Inhibition in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Henry A Tran; Arthur Schwartzbard; Howard S Weintraub
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-08

4.  Hypertension: Do calcium-channel blockers increase breast cancer risk?

Authors:  Ange Wang; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Pharmacologic Management of Cancer Therapeutics-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Adult Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  J Emanuel Finet; Gregory A Wiggers
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-08

Review 6.  2010 position paper of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Alberto Morganti
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  Does outcome reporting bias "cause" cancer? Risks associated with hidden data on Angiotensin receptor blockers.

Authors:  Gregory Egan; Jana Lee; Rajwant Minhas; Aaron M Tejani
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-09

8.  Angiotensin and systems thinking: wrapping your mind around the big picture.

Authors:  Gary Robert Smith
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

9.  Hypertension as a predictor of advanced colorectal cancer outcome and cetuximab treatment response.

Authors:  S Sud; C O'Callaghan; C Jonker; C Karapetis; T Price; N Tebbutt; J Shapiro; G Van Hazel; N Pavlakis; P Gibbs; M Jeffrey; L Siu; S Gill; R Wong; D Jonker; D Tu; R Goodwin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  George A Makar; John H Holmes; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.