Literature DB >> 21122854

Impact of prehypertension on carotid artery intima-media thickening: actual or masked?

Efstathios Manios1, Fotios Michas, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Kimon Stamatelopoulos, Georgios Tsagalis, Eleni Koroboki, Eleftheria Alexaki, Christos Papamichael, Konstantinos Vemmos, Nikolaos Zakopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported that prehypertension is associated with increased values of common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels on the association of prehypertension with CCA intima-media thickening in prehypertensive subjects.
METHODS: A total of 807 subjects with office systolic BP<140 and diastolic BP<90mmHg, underwent 24h ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring and carotid artery ultrasonographic measurements. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to office and daytime ABP levels: (1) normotensives: subjects with office BP<120/80mmHg and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range, (2) actual prehypertensives: individuals with office SBP (120-139mmHg) and/or DBP (80-89mmHg) and daytime ambulatory BP values within the normal range and (3) prehypertensives with masked hypertension (MH): patients with office SBP (120-139mmHg) and/or DBP (80-89mmHg) and elevated daytime ambulatory BP values.
RESULTS: Prehypertensive patients with MH had higher (p<0.01) CCA-IMT values (0.712mm; 95%CI: 0.698-0.725) than actual prehypertensives (0.649mm; 95%CI: 0.641-0.656) and normotensives (0.655mm; 95%CI: 0.641-0.670) even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Normotensives and actual prehypertensives did not differ significantly regarding CCA-IMT values (p>0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, (including demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, and office BP) prehypertension with MH was independently (p<0.01) associated with a 0.06mm increment in CCA-IMT (95%CI: 0.03-0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with office BP levels in the prehypertensive range, who also have elevated daytime ABP levels, had higher CCA-IMT values than patients with prehypertension with normal daytime ABP values and normotensive individuals. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21122854     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  6 in total

1.  Prehypertension or masked hypertension-which is responsible for target-organ damage?

Authors:  Ying Chen; Yu-li Huang; Wei-yi Mai
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation in African Americans with masked-hypertension.

Authors:  Praveen Veerabhadrappa; Keith M Diaz; Deborah L Feairheller; Katie M Sturgeon; Sheara T Williamson; Deborah L Crabbe; Abul M Kashem; Michael D Brown
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Out-of-office blood pressure improves risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension people.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Jana Brguljan-Hitij; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Endothelial wall thickness, cardiorespiratory fitness and inflammatory markers in obese and non-obese adolescents.

Authors:  Larissa R Silva; Cláudia Cavaglieri; Wendell A Lopes; Juliana Pizzi; Manuel J C Coelho-e-Silva; Neiva Leite
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Intima-Media Thickness Is Linearly and Continuously Associated With Systolic Blood Pressure in a Population-Based Cohort (STANISLAS Cohort Study).

Authors:  João Pedro Ferreira; Nicolas Girerd; Erwan Bozec; Jean Loup Machu; Jean-Marc Boivin; Gérard M London; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Association of prehypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia with subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic Chinese: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Zhihao Chen; Xiaoqi Dong; Guangming Qin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.