Literature DB >> 21122178

Prolonged mechanical ventilation in Massachusetts: the 2006 prevalence survey.

Miguel J Divo1, Susan Murray, Felipe Cortopassi, Bartolome R Celli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged mechanical ventilation and home ventilation impose unique challenges on patients, families, and the healthcare system. In the absence of a centralized database to track prolonged and home ventilation, there has been a paucity of prevalence studies, and what is known is outdated. We surveyed respiratory care managers working in the state of Massachusetts to estimate the prevalence and locations of prolonged and home ventilation in 2006.
METHODS: We invited 113 respiratory care managers practicing in acute-care hospitals, long-term acute-care facilities (also known as weaning units, step-down units, and long-term-ventilation units), and home-care companies to participate in a Web-based survey. We matched the responses to their respective institutions and analyzed the results according to hospital size, location (urban or suburban), and whether the institution was a teaching institution.
RESULTS: In December of 2006 there were 817 ventilated patients, of whom 460 met the criteria for prolonged ventilation (> 21 d for at least 6 h/d) and 221 met the criteria for home ventilation (ventilation for any period of time at home). Of the 239 patients not at home, 64 were in acute-care hospitals, 175 in long-term acute-care facilities, and 221 at home. The survey response rate was 86% for acute-care hospitals with ≥ 400 beds, 48% for acute-care hospitals with < 400 beds, 65% for long-term acute-care facilities, and 67% for home-care companies. The non-respondents were primarily smaller, suburban, non-teaching hospitals, which have a low prevalence of prolonged-ventilation patients. Among the home-ventilation patients, the majority had neuromuscular diseases, were < 65 years old, and were ventilated via tracheostomy tube. The most important limitations to transitioning prolonged-ventilation patients to home ventilation appeared to be lack of family and/or economic support.
CONCLUSIONS: In Massachusetts, the estimated prevalence of prolonged and home ventilation increased from 2.8/100,000 inhabitants in 1983 to 7.1/100,000 inhabitants in 2006, and the majority of them are in long-term acute-care facilities, large urban teaching hospitals, and at home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21122178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  6 in total

Review 1.  Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Sarina Sahetya; Sarah Allgood; Peter C Gay; Noah Lechtzin
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.878

2.  Institutional care for long-term mechanical ventilation in Canada: A national survey.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Douglas McKim; Sherri Katz; David Leasa; Mika Nonoyama; Cheryl Pedersen; Monica Avendano; Roger Goldstein
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  An intermediate respiratory care unit for spinal cord-injured patients. A retrospective study.

Authors:  J Romero-Ganuza; A García-Forcada; E Vargas; C Gambarrutta
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Patient characteristics and outcomes of a home mechanical ventilation program in a developing country.

Authors:  Narongkorn Saiphoklang; Apichart Kanitsap; Pitchayapa Ruchiwit; Pattarin Pirompanich; Thiti Sricharoenchai; Christopher B Cooper
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2019 May-Jun

5.  Determinants of the health care service choices of long-term mechanical ventilation patients: Applying andersen's behavioral model.

Authors:  Hui-Yu Liang; Ming-Der Lee; Kuan-Chia Lin; Lieh-Hann Lin; Shu Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Patterns of use, survival and prognostic factors in patients receiving home mechanical ventilation in Western Australia: A single centre historical cohort study.

Authors:  Geak Poh Tan; Nigel McArdle; Satvinder Singh Dhaliwal; Jane Douglas; Clare Siobhan Rea; Bhajan Singh
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.444

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.