OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions, understandings, and experiences of maternity service staff toward the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund (WHO/UNICEF) Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and its implementation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). DESIGN: An exploratory study using naturalistic methods of inquiry. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a total of four Australian metropolitan maternity hospitals of which two included a NICU. Focus groups and individual interviews were undertaken in the participants' choice of location, usually hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven participants included nursing and midwifery staff and one pediatrician. METHODS: Data from focus groups and interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis used to identify themes related to implementation and perceptions of staff regarding BFHI. RESULTS: Major themes identified focused on the differences in NICUs relative to maternity units, separate worlds of mother and infant, the hard work involved in implementing the BFHI, and the positive attitude that BFHI can be achieved. There were misconceptions by participants on the nature of the BFHI as it applied to NICUs. Factors hindering and supporting BFHI implementation were also identified. CONCLUSION: Motivated staff, educational support, and clear guidelines are essential to support implementation of the BFHI in NICUs.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions, understandings, and experiences of maternity service staff toward the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund (WHO/UNICEF) Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and its implementation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). DESIGN: An exploratory study using naturalistic methods of inquiry. SETTING:Participants were recruited from a total of four Australian metropolitan maternity hospitals of which two included a NICU. Focus groups and individual interviews were undertaken in the participants' choice of location, usually hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven participants included nursing and midwifery staff and one pediatrician. METHODS: Data from focus groups and interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis used to identify themes related to implementation and perceptions of staff regarding BFHI. RESULTS: Major themes identified focused on the differences in NICUs relative to maternity units, separate worlds of mother and infant, the hard work involved in implementing the BFHI, and the positive attitude that BFHI can be achieved. There were misconceptions by participants on the nature of the BFHI as it applied to NICUs. Factors hindering and supporting BFHI implementation were also identified. CONCLUSION: Motivated staff, educational support, and clear guidelines are essential to support implementation of the BFHI in NICUs.
Authors: Nabila Zaka; Emma C Alexander; Logan Manikam; Irena C F Norman; Melika Akhbari; Sarah Moxon; Pavani Kalluri Ram; Georgina Murphy; Mike English; Susan Niermeyer; Luwei Pearson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 7.327