PURPOSE: To determine the long-term cognitive and educational outcomes in children prospectively identified at the time of a first unprovoked seizure. METHODS: A cohort of children with a first unprovoked seizure was enrolled and followed for a mean of 15 years. Cognitive function and educational outcomes were determined 10 or more years after the first seizure via standardized neuropsychological tests, school records, and structured interviews. Children with symptomatic etiology were excluded from the analysis. When available, siblings of study subjects were recruited as normal controls. Primary educational outcome was defined as enrollment into special education services or grade repetition. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of (43 of 153) of children with a single seizure and 40% (42 of 105) of children with epilepsy received special education service or repeated a grade (p = 0.05). There was a statistically significant trend in which the children with more seizures tended to require special education or repeat a grade more often (28% in single seizure group vs. 34% in 2-9 seizure group vs. 64% in ≥10 seizure group; p = 0.004). Of 163 subjects who completed neuropsychological testing, children with single seizures tended to score higher than children with epilepsy on Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (WRAT) reading (p = 0.08), Test of Non-Verbal Intelligence-II (TONI-II) (p = 0.02), and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)/Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (p = 0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between children with a single seizure and sibling controls. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that children with a single seizure represent a group that is distinctly different from children with epilepsy and are more similar to sibling controls. In contrast, even children with very mild epilepsy have significantly worse educational outcomes. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PURPOSE: To determine the long-term cognitive and educational outcomes in children prospectively identified at the time of a first unprovoked seizure. METHODS: A cohort of children with a first unprovoked seizure was enrolled and followed for a mean of 15 years. Cognitive function and educational outcomes were determined 10 or more years after the first seizure via standardized neuropsychological tests, school records, and structured interviews. Children with symptomatic etiology were excluded from the analysis. When available, siblings of study subjects were recruited as normal controls. Primary educational outcome was defined as enrollment into special education services or grade repetition. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of (43 of 153) of children with a single seizure and 40% (42 of 105) of children with epilepsy received special education service or repeated a grade (p = 0.05). There was a statistically significant trend in which the children with more seizures tended to require special education or repeat a grade more often (28% in single seizure group vs. 34% in 2-9 seizure group vs. 64% in ≥10 seizure group; p = 0.004). Of 163 subjects who completed neuropsychological testing, children with single seizures tended to score higher than children with epilepsy on Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (WRAT) reading (p = 0.08), Test of Non-Verbal Intelligence-II (TONI-II) (p = 0.02), and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)/Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (p = 0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between children with a single seizure and sibling controls. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that children with a single seizure represent a group that is distinctly different from children with epilepsy and are more similar to sibling controls. In contrast, even children with very mild epilepsy have significantly worse educational outcomes. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Nadine H J Engelberts; Martin Klein; Henk M van der Ploeg; Jan J Heimans; Herman J Adèr; Martin P J van Boxtel; Jelle Jolles; Dorotheé G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité Journal: J Neurol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Ellen Northcott; Anne M Connolly; Anna Berroya; Mark Sabaz; Jenny McIntyre; Jane Christie; Alan Taylor; Jennifer Batchelor; Andrew F Bleasel; John A Lawson; Ann M E Bye Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Anne T Berg; Susan N Smith; Daniel Frobish; Susan R Levy; Francine M Testa; Barbara Beckerman; Shlomo Shinnar Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Mira Karrasch; Petri Tiitta; Bruce Hermann; Juho Joutsa; Shlomo Shinnar; Juha Rinne; Anu Anttinen; Matti Sillanpää Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Donna Perazzo; Ryan Moore; Nadine A Kasparian; Megan Rodts; Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Lori Crosby; Brian Turpin; Andrew F Beck; John Hutton Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Dace N Almane; Qianqian Zhao; Paul J Rathouz; Melissa Hanson; Daren C Jackson; David A Hsu; Carl E Stafstrom; Jana E Jones; Michael Seidenberg; Monica Koehn; Bruce P Hermann Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Kathryn Burton; Jane Rogathe; Roger G Whittaker; Kshitij Mankad; Ewan Hunter; Matthew J Burton; Jim Todd; Brian G R Neville; Richard Walker; Charles R J C Newton Journal: Seizure Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 3.184