Literature DB >> 21121817

Individualized catheter surveillance among neonates: a prospective, 8-year, single-center experience.

Walter Zingg1, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Riccardo E Pfister, Sylvie Touveneau, Didier Pittet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To monitor trends in central line-associated bloodstream infections and clinical sepsis (CLABICS) among neonates and to determine risk factors for infection, especially dwell time.
DESIGN: Prospective, single-center cohort study conducted from 2001 through 2008.
SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care center.
METHODS: Individualized surveillance of catheter use and CLABICS episodes was conducted. Data were obtained via regular on-site visits made 3 times a week. Trends over time were estimated by Poisson regression, and risk factor analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression.
RESULTS: In all, 1,124 neonates were exposed to 2,210 central lines for a total of 12,746 catheter-days and 11,467 catheter-days at risk. The median duration of catheter use was 8 (interquartile range, 5-11) days for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 4 (interquartile range, 2-6) days for umbilical catheters; 102 CLABICS episodes were detected. The median time to infection was 7 days. Incidence densities were 8.5 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter-days at risk and 8.0 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter-days. The highest rates were identified among neonates weighing 750 g or lower (14.9 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter days at risk) and for PICCs (13.2 CLABICS episodes per 1,000 catheter days at risk). Catheter dwell time was associated with CLABICS for all umbilical catheters (odds ratio [OR], 1.2 per day of use [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-1.3]; P < .001) and for PICCs for up to 7 days (OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]; P = .041), but not thereafter (OR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9-1.1]; P = .90).
CONCLUSION: Catheter dwell time is a risk factor for CLABICS during the first 7 days, irrespective of catheter type. After 7 days, PICCs are less likely to become infected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121817     DOI: 10.1086/657634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  7 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Neonates.

Authors:  Heladia García; Belina Romano-Carro; Guadalupe Miranda-Novales; Héctor Jaime González-Cabello; Juan Carlos Núñez-Enríquez
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim Gibson; Rebecca Sharp; Amanda Ullman; Scott Morris; Tricia Kleidon; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Central Venous Catheter-Related Infectious Complications in Pediatric Surgical Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Rudrashish Haldar; Ankur Mandelia; Prabhaker Mishra; Ashwani Mishra; Yousuf Siddiqui
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2021-02-17

Review 4.  Early planned removal of umbilical venous catheters to prevent infection in newborn infants.

Authors:  Adrienne Gordon; Mark Greenhalgh; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-10

5.  Catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-30

6.  Effect of Catheter Dwell Time on Risk of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Infants.

Authors:  Rachel G Greenberg; Keith M Cochran; P Brian Smith; Barbara S Edson; Joseph Schulman; Henry C Lee; Balaji Govindaswami; Alfonso Pantoja; Doug Hardy; John Curran; Della Lin; Sheree Kuo; Akihiko Noguchi; Patricia Ittmann; Scott Duncan; Munish Gupta; Alan Picarillo; Padmani Karna; Morris Cohen; Michael Giuliano; Sheri Carroll; Brandi Page; Judith Guzman-Cottrill; M Whit Walker; Jeff Garland; Janice K Ancona; Dan L Ellsbury; Matthew M Laughon; Martin J McCaffrey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 9.703

Review 7.  Risk of parenteral nutrition in neonates--an overview.

Authors:  Walter Zingg; Maren Tomaske; Maria Martin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.