Literature DB >> 21121811

Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic studies of pharmacogenomic tests.

Mathieu Beaulieu1, Simon de Denus, Jean Lachaine.   

Abstract

There is currently a lack of consensus on the components that should be included in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmacogenomic tests. We conducted a systematic review focusing on pharmacogenomic tests to identify and comment on key parameters. The articles selected as economic analyses were classified using a framework including components related to testing, model, health outcomes, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We found 15 studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. A high degree of heterogeneity between evaluations was observed even within studies evaluating the same pharmacogenomic test. Components specific to pharmacogenomic tests were identified as marker prevalence, population ethnicity, pharmacogenomic treatment effect and cost of genomic data collection and analysis. In order to fully assess all aspects of pharmacogenomic testing, future pharmacoeconomic assessments should include every specific component that has an impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121811     DOI: 10.2217/pgs.10.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  17 in total

Review 1.  Precision Medicine: From Science To Value.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of maternal CYP2D6 genetic testing to guide treatment for postpartum pain and avert infant adverse events.

Authors:  M E Moretti; D F Lato; H Berger; G Koren; S Ito; W J Ungar
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Fahim Faruque; Heejung Noh; Arif Hussain; Edward Neuberger; Eberechukwu Onukwugha
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Economics of stratified medicine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sean Gavan; Mark Harrison; Cynthia Iglesias; Anne Barton; Andrea Manca; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Guidance for the Harmonisation and Improvement of Economic Evaluations of Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Heleen Vellekoop; Simone Huygens; Matthijs Versteegh; László Szilberhorn; Tamás Zelei; Balázs Nagy; Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Sarah Wordsworth; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomic Screening Tests: A Systematic Review. Second Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Elizabeth J J Berm; Margot de Looff; Bob Wilffert; Cornelis Boersma; Lieven Annemans; Stefan Vegter; Job F M van Boven; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Prevention of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Catrin O Plumpton; Daniel Roberts; Munir Pirmohamed; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Julie Ann Sakowski; Julia Trosman; Michael P Douglas; Su-Ying Liang; Peter Neumann
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments.

Authors:  Fatiha H Shabaruddin; Nigel D Fleeman; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2015-06-24

10.  Evidence used in model-based economic evaluations for evaluating pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic tests: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Jaime L Peters; Chris Cooper; James Buchanan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.