Literature DB >> 21121745

Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.

Risheng Xu1, Matthew J McGirt, Edward G Sutter, Daniel M Sciubba, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Timothy F Witham, Ziya L Gokaslan, Ali Bydon.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to conduct the first in vitro biomechanical comparison of immediate and postcyclical rigidities of C-7 lateral mass versus C-7 pedicle screws in posterior C4-7 constructs.
METHODS: Ten human cadaveric spines were treated with C4-6 lateral mass screw and C-7 lateral mass (5 specimens) versus pedicle (5 specimens) screw fixation. Spines were potted in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement and placed on a materials testing machine. Rotation about the axis of bending was measured using passive retroreflective markers and infrared motion capture cameras. The motion of C-4 relative to C-7 in flexion-extension and lateral bending was assessed uninstrumented, immediately after instrumentation, and following 40,000 cycles of 4 Nm of flexion-extension and lateral bending moments at 1 Hz. The effect of instrumentation and cyclical loading on rotational motion across C4-7 was analyzed for significance.
RESULTS: Preinstrumented spines for the 2 cohorts were comparable in bone mineral density and range of motion in both flexion-extension (p = 0.33) and lateral bending (p = 0.16). Lateral mass and pedicle screw constructs significantly reduced motion during flexion-extension (11.3°-0.26° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.002; 10.51°-0.30° for pedicle screws, p = 0.008) and lateral bending (7.38°-0.27° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.003; 11.65°-0.49° for pedicle screws, p = 0.03). After cyclical loading in both cohorts, rotational motion over C4-7 was increased during flexion-extension (0.26°-0.68° for lateral mass screws; 0.30°-1.31° for pedicle screws) and lateral bending (0.27°-0.39° and 0.49°-0.80°, respectively), although the increase was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postcyclical flexion-extension (p = 0.20) and lateral bending (0.10) between lateral mass and pedicle screws.
CONCLUSIONS: Both C-7 lateral mass and C-7 pedicle screws allow equally rigid fixation of subaxial lateral mass constructs ending at C-7. Immediately and within a simulated 6-week postfixation period, C-7 lateral mass screws may be as effective as C-7 pedicle screws in biomechanically stabilizing long subaxial lateral mass constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121745     DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  Spinous process plate fixation for cervical spinal fusion after spinal trauma: two case reports.

Authors:  Hiroki Hirabayashi; Jun Takahashi; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Nobuhide Ogihara; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Shugo Kuraishi; Masayuki Shimizu; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Renzo Matsue; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Quantitative Anatomy of C7 Vertebra in Southern Chinese for Insertion of Lateral Mass Screws and Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  Michael Siu Hei Tse; Chi Hin Chan; Kam Kwong Wong; Wing Cheung Wong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

3.  Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Surabhi Subramanian; Sushma Viswanathan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

4.  Safety and efficacy of lateral mass screws at C7 in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Chengmin Zhang; Qiang Zhou; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-09-07

5.  Risk Factor Analysis of Facet Fusion Following Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Fixation with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-up: Assessment of Maximal Insertional Screw Torque and Incidence of Loosening.

Authors:  Ryo Kanematsu; Junya Hanakita; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Manabu Minami; Tomoo Inoue; Fumiaki Honda
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.