Literature DB >> 21121672

Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels.

Kimberley A Mullins1, W Michael Griffin, H Scott Matthews.   

Abstract

Biofuels have received legislative support recently in California's Low-Carbon Fuel Standard and the Federal Energy Independence and Security Act. Both present new fuel types, but neither provides methodological guidelines for dealing with the inherent uncertainty in evaluating their potential life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions reductions are based on point estimates only. This work demonstrates the use of Monte Carlo simulation to estimate life-cycle emissions distributions from ethanol and butanol from corn or switchgrass. Life-cycle emissions distributions for each feedstock and fuel pairing modeled span an order of magnitude or more. Using a streamlined life-cycle assessment, corn ethanol emissions range from 50 to 250 g CO(2)e/MJ, for example, and each feedstock-fuel pathway studied shows some probability of greater emissions than a distribution for gasoline. Potential GHG emissions reductions from displacing fossil fuels with biofuels are difficult to forecast given this high degree of uncertainty in life-cycle emissions. This uncertainty is driven by the importance and uncertainty of indirect land use change emissions. Incorporating uncertainty in the decision making process can illuminate the risks of policy failure (e.g., increased emissions), and a calculated risk of failure due to uncertainty can be used to inform more appropriate reduction targets in future biofuel policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121672     DOI: 10.1021/es1024993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Mutagenicity emission factors of canola oil and waste vegetable oil biodiesel: Comparison to soy biodiesel.

Authors:  David M DeMarini; Esra Mutlu; Sarah H Warren; Charly King; M Ian Gilmour; William P Linak
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.

Authors:  Tyler J Lark; Nathan P Hendricks; Aaron Smith; Nicholas Pates; Seth A Spawn-Lee; Matthew Bougie; Eric G Booth; Christopher J Kucharik; Holly K Gibbs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.