Literature DB >> 21121662

Secondary organic aerosol from ozonolysis of biogenic volatile organic compounds: chamber studies of particle and reactive oxygen species formation.

Xi Chen1, Philip K Hopke, William P L Carter.   

Abstract

The formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) produced from α-pinene, linalool, and limonene by ozonolysis was examined using a dynamic chamber system that allowed the simulation of ventilated indoor environments. Experiments were conducted at typical room temperatures and air exchange rates. Limonene ozonolysis produced the highest SOA mass concentrations and linalool the lowest with α-pinene being intermediate. Simplified empirical modeling simulations were conducted to provide insights into reaction chemistry. Assessment of variability of particle-bound reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be important in the understanding of health effects associated with particulate matter. The ROS intensities defined as ROS/SOA mass were found to be moderately correlated with the SOA densities. Greater ROS intensities were observed for the cases where ozone was in excess. ROS intensities approached a relatively constant value in the region where ozone was in deficit. The estimated initial ROS half-life time was approximately 6.5 h at room temperature suggesting the time sensitivity of ROS measurements. The ROS formed from terpenoid ozonolysis could be separated into three categories: short-lived/high reactive/volatile, semivolatile/relatively stable and nonvolatile/low reactive species based on ROS measurements under various conditions. Such physical characterization of the ROS in terms of reactivity and volatility provides some insights into the nature of ROS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121662     DOI: 10.1021/es102166c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs)-2. Are free hydroxyl radicals generated in aqueous solutions?

Authors:  Lavrent Khachatryan; Barry Dellinger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Hydroxyl radical generation from environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) in PM2.5.

Authors:  William Gehling; Lavrent Khachatryan; Barry Dellinger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Quantifying trace elements in the emitted particulate matter during cooking and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Soudabeh Gorjinezhad; Aiymgul Kerimray; Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh; Melek Keleş; Fatma Ozturk; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during non-haze and haze days in Shanghai: characterization and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation.

Authors:  Deming Han; Zhen Wang; Jinping Cheng; Qian Wang; Xiaojia Chen; Heling Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A Scalable Field Study Protocol and Rationale for Passive Ambient Air Sampling: A Spatial Phytosampling for Leaf Data Collection.

Authors:  Tonny J Oyana; Slawomir M Lomnicki; Chuqi Guo; Stephania A Cormier
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Triggering of cardiovascular hospital admissions by source specific fine particle concentrations in urban centers of New York State.

Authors:  David Q Rich; Wangjian Zhang; Shao Lin; Stefania Squizzato; Sally W Thurston; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Daniel Croft; Mauro Masiol; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  In vitro exposures in diesel exhaust atmospheres: resuspension of PM from filters versus direct deposition of PM from air.

Authors:  Kim M Lichtveld; Seth M Ebersviller; Kenneth G Sexton; William Vizuete; Ilona Jaspers; Harvey E Jeffries
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Interconversion of chromium species during air sampling: effects of O3, NO2, SO2, particle matrices, temperature, and humidity.

Authors:  Lihui Huang; Zhihua Tina Fan; Chang Ho Yu; Philip K Hopke; Paul J Lioy; Brian T Buckley; Lin Lin; Yingjun Ma
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Changes in the hospitalization and ED visit rates for respiratory diseases associated with source-specific PM2.5 in New York State from 2005 to 2016.

Authors:  Philip K Hopke; Daniel P Croft; Wangjian Zhang; Shao Lin; Mauro Masiol; Stefania Squizzato; Sally W Thurston; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Mark J Utell; David Q Rich
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs). 3. Free versus bound hydroxyl radicals in EPFR aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Lavrent Khachatryan; Cheri A McFerrin; Randall W Hall; Barry Dellinger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.