Literature DB >> 21121503

Comparison of in-office dental unit waterline test kits.

Barry F Morris1, Kraig S Vandewalle, Donna M Hensley, Joseph A Bartoloni.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a study to determine the validity of two commercially available in-office dental unit waterline test kits compared to the gold standard, R2A agar. Samples were collected from the air/water syringes of dental units and cultured on HPC Samplers, Petrifilm AC Plates, and R2A agar plates. HPC Samplers and R2A agar plates were incubated for 7 days and counted manually using magnification. Petrifilm AC Plates were counted after incubation time of 5 and 7 days using an electronic-plate reader. Validity measurements were calculated using a cutoff value < or = 500 colony-forming units per milliliter. The accuracy for the HPC Sampler compared to R2A agar was 71%. The accuracy for the Petrifilm AC Plates at 5 and 7 days was 79% and 87% compared to R2A agar. The Petrifilm AC Plate (7-day incubation) demonstrated higher sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy than the HPC Sampler kit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121503     DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring dental-unit-water-line output water by current in-office test kits.

Authors:  Sham Lal; Sim K Singhrao; Matt Bricknell; Mark Pearce; L H Glyn Morton; Waqar Ahmed; St John Crean
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods.

Authors:  Nuala Porteous; Yuyu Sun; John Schoolfield
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

3.  Managing dental unit waterlines: a quality improvement programme.

Authors:  Fahad Umer; Madiha Khan; Farhan Raza Khan; Karim Tejani
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.