Arun Mullaji1, Gautam M Shetty. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India. arunmullaji@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The weightbearing axis of the limb goes from the pelvis to the ground and includes the hindfoot. However, the influence of hindfoot alignment on mechanical axis and overall limb alignment after TKA is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore addressed the following questions: (1) Does hindfoot alignment change after TKA for knee osteoarthritis? (2) What factors influence hindfoot alignment after TKA? (3) Does deviation of the mechanical axis from the center of the knee vary when the hindfoot is considered (ground mechanical axis) as compared with when it is not (conventional mechanical axis) after TKA? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively reviewed the radiographs of 125 patients who underwent 165 TKAs. We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, conventional mechanical axis deviation, ground mechanical axis (mechanical axis which included the hindfoot) deviation, and tibiocalcaneal angle. RESULTS: The preoperative hindfoot valgus alignment decreased after TKA. Preoperative hindfoot alignment was the only factor that influenced hindfoot alignment after TKA. The conventional mechanical axis showed less deviation from the center of the knee when compared with ground mechanical axis which showed lateral deviation after TKA. Despite limb alignment being restored to within 3° of neutral of the conventional mechanical axis after TKA, 29% of limbs had a postoperative ground mechanical axis deviation of 10 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate restoration of limb alignment after TKA may be associated with persistent hindfoot valgus alignment with the ground mechanical axis passing lateral to the center of the knee. This could have implications on long-term survival of the implant owing to possible excessive loading laterally and needs further investigation.
BACKGROUND: The weightbearing axis of the limb goes from the pelvis to the ground and includes the hindfoot. However, the influence of hindfoot alignment on mechanical axis and overall limb alignment after TKA is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore addressed the following questions: (1) Does hindfoot alignment change after TKA for knee osteoarthritis? (2) What factors influence hindfoot alignment after TKA? (3) Does deviation of the mechanical axis from the center of the knee vary when the hindfoot is considered (ground mechanical axis) as compared with when it is not (conventional mechanical axis) after TKA? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively reviewed the radiographs of 125 patients who underwent 165 TKAs. We evaluated the preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, conventional mechanical axis deviation, ground mechanical axis (mechanical axis which included the hindfoot) deviation, and tibiocalcaneal angle. RESULTS: The preoperative hindfoot valgus alignment decreased after TKA. Preoperative hindfoot alignment was the only factor that influenced hindfoot alignment after TKA. The conventional mechanical axis showed less deviation from the center of the knee when compared with ground mechanical axis which showed lateral deviation after TKA. Despite limb alignment being restored to within 3° of neutral of the conventional mechanical axis after TKA, 29% of limbs had a postoperative ground mechanical axis deviation of 10 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate restoration of limb alignment after TKA may be associated with persistent hindfoot valgus alignment with the ground mechanical axis passing lateral to the center of the knee. This could have implications on long-term survival of the implant owing to possible excessive loading laterally and needs further investigation.
Authors: John B Meding; E Michael Keating; Merrill A Ritter; Philip M Faris; Michael E Berend; Robert A Malinzak Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Adam A Norton; John J Callaghan; Annunziato Amendola; Phinit Phisitkul; Siwadol Wongsak; Steve S Liu; Catherine Fruehling-Wall Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.176