Literature DB >> 21120678

Comparison of the clinical symptoms and the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors for patients with pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 or seasonal H1N1 influenza in the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 seasons.

Naoki Kawai1, Hideyuki Ikematsu, Osame Tanaka, Shinro Matsuura, Tetsunari Maeda, Satoshi Yamauchi, Nobuo Hirotsu, Mika Nishimura, Norio Iwaki, Seizaburo Kashiwagi.   

Abstract

The clinical symptoms and effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) have not been adequately compared among pandemic H1N1 2009 patients, seasonal H1N1 patients, and patients with H1N1 with the H275Y mutation. The data of 68 seasonal H1N1 patients in 2007-2008, 193 seasonal H1N1 patients in 2008-2009, and 361 pandemic H1N1 2009 patients diagnosed by PCR who received an NAI were analyzed. The duration of fever (body temperature ≥ 37.5 ºC) after the first dose of NAI and from onset was calculated. The H275Y neuraminidase mutation status was determined for 166 patients. Significantly lower mean age (18.4 ± 13.2 years) and a higher percentage of teenagers (53.7%) were found for pandemic 2009 influenza than for seasonal influenza (P < 0.001). The peak body temperature was equivalent (mean, 39.0 ºC) in the three seasons, and the frequency of symptoms was the same or lower for pandemic influenza compared with seasonal H1N1. None of the 34 analyzed pandemic H1N1 virus isolates contained the H275Y mutation, which was commonly detected in the 2008-2009 season. The duration of fever after the start of oseltamivir therapy was significantly shorter for patients with pandemic (23.0 ± 11.6 h) than with seasonal H1N1 in both the 2008-2009 (49.7 ± 32.3 h) and 2007-2008 seasons (32.0 ± 18.9 h). The mean duration of fever after the first dose of zanamivir was not different among the three seasons (26.9-31.5 h). Clinical symptoms were the same or somewhat milder, and oseltamivir was more effective, for pandemic 2009 than for seasonal H1N1 influenza with or without H275Y mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21120678     DOI: 10.1007/s10156-010-0179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  4 in total

1.  The in vivo efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors cannot be determined from the decay rates of influenza viral titers observed in treated patients.

Authors:  John Palmer; Hana M Dobrovolny; Catherine A A Beauchemin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Increased symptom severity but unchanged neuraminidase inhibitor effectiveness for A(H1N1)pdm09 in the 2010-2011 season: comparison with the previous season and with seasonal A(H3N2) and B.

Authors:  Naoki Kawai; Hideyuki Ikematsu; Takashi Kawashima; Tetsunari Maeda; Hiroshi Ukai; Nobuo Hirotsu; Norio Iwaki; Seizaburo Kashiwagi
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 3.  The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Barbara Michiels; Karolien Van Puyenbroeck; Veronique Verhoeven; Etienne Vermeire; Samuel Coenen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pandemic H1N1 illness prognosis: evidence from clinical and epidemiological data from the first pandemic wave in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Nancy Cristina Junqueira Bellei; Tatiane Karen Cabeça; Emerson Carraro; Janaína Midori Goto; Gabriel Trova Cuba; Sônia Regina Hidalgo; Marcelo Nascimento Burattini
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.