Literature DB >> 21120664

The distribution and co-occurrence of physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in a general working population.

Johanna Kausto1, Helena Miranda, Irmeli Pehkonen, Markku Heliövaara, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Svetlana Solovieva.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that physical and psychosocial exposures at work increase the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to describe the distribution and co-occurrence of these risk factors in the working population.
METHODS: We used data from the Health 2000 survey carried out in Finland in 2000-2001. The sample of our study consisted of 2,491 men and 2,613 women who had been actively working during the year preceding the survey. Logistic regression and exploratory factor analysis were used to analyze the co-occurrence of the work-related risk factors.
RESULTS: Exposure to high physical work load and several co-occurring work load factors was more prevalent among men than women. In women, as opposed to men, the highest exposure to most physical work load factors was found in their later work life. Gender and age showed weak associations with psychosocial work load factors. Low socioeconomic position, in both genders, was related to an increased risk of being exposed to several co-occurring physical or psychosocial factors. Physical exposures most frequently co-occurred with high job demands and low job control in men. Among women, physical exposures were found to co-occur with high job demands, low job control and job insecurity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel information on the occupational exposures in general working population. It appears that co-occurrence of physical and psychosocial exposures should be considered in research and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. In addition, a broader set of occupational factors, e.g., work organization, are suggested to be included in future studies to cover all the relevant determinants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21120664     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-010-0597-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  31 in total

Review 1.  Physical risk factors for neck pain.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  Broadening the view of exposure assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention.

Authors:  L A MacDonald; R A Karasek; L Punnett; T Scharf
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Temporary employment and health: a review.

Authors:  Marianna Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki; Matti Joensuu; Pekka Virtanen; Marko Elovainio; Jussi Vahtera
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Gender differences in the association of age with physical workload and functioning.

Authors:  A Aittomäki; E Lahelma; E Roos; P Leino-Arjas; P Martikainen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Work stress and incidence of newly diagnosed fibromyalgia: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mika Kivimäki; Päivi Leino-Arjas; Marianna Virtanen; Marko Elovainio; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Sampsa Puttonen; Maarit Vartia; Eric Brunner; Jussi Vahtera
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; H D van de Mheen; K Stronks; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Gender adjustment or stratification in discerning upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder risk?

Authors:  Barbara Silverstein; Z Joyce Fan; Caroline K Smith; Stephen Bao; Ninica Howard; Peregrin Spielholz; David Bonauto; Eira Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Socioeconomic status, working conditions and self-rated health in Switzerland: explaining the gradient in men and women.

Authors:  Georg F Bauer; Carola A Huber; Gregor J Jenny; Frithjof Müller; Oliver Hämmig
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Social class and cardiovascular disease: the contribution of work.

Authors:  M Marmot; T Theorell
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.663

View more
  9 in total

1.  Further Trends in Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Comparison of Risk Factors for Symptoms Using Quality of Work Life Data From the 2002, 2006, and 2010 General Social Survey.

Authors:  Robert B Dick; Brian D Lowe; Ming-Lun Lu; Edward F Krieg
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Do physical or psychosocial factors at work predict multi-site musculoskeletal pain? A 4-year follow-up study in an industrial population.

Authors:  Subas Neupane; Helena Miranda; Pekka Virtanen; Anna Siukola; Clas-Håkan Nygård
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Expert ratings of job demand and job control as predictors of injury and musculoskeletal disorder risk in a manufacturing cohort.

Authors:  Linda F Cantley; Baylah Tessier-Sherman; Martin D Slade; Deron Galusha; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Long-term physical workload in middle age and disability pension in men and women: a follow-up study of Swedish cohorts.

Authors:  Katarina Kjellberg; Andreas Lundin; Daniel Falkstedt; Peter Allebeck; Tomas Hemmingsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  The Unequal Burden of Self-Reported Musculoskeletal Pains Among South Korean and European Employees Based on Age, Gender, and Employment Status.

Authors:  Jinwook Bahk; Young-Ho Khang; Sinye Lim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-10-24

Review 6.  Sex and Gender Differences in Occupational Hazard Exposures: a Scoping Review of the Recent Literature.

Authors:  A Biswas; S Harbin; E Irvin; H Johnston; M Begum; M Tiong; D Apedaile; M Koehoorn; P Smith
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-11-27

7.  Long-term sick leave for back pain, exposure to physical workload and psychosocial factors at work, and risk of disability and early-age retirement among aged Swedish workers.

Authors:  Angelo d'Errico; Daniel Falkstedt; Melody Almroth; Kathryn Badarin; Tomas Hemmingsson; Katarina Kjellberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  Prevalence and its risk factors for low back pain among operation and maintenance personnel in wind farms.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Tao Li; Shuangqiu Hu; Xinhe Zhu; Kang Sun; Long Yi; Qiong Zhang; Guilian Luo; Yuzhen Li; Xueyan Zhang; Yongen Gu; Zhongxu Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Validation of an Embedded Motion-Capture and EMG Setup for the Analysis of Musculoskeletal Disorder Risks during Manhole Cover Handling.

Authors:  Rémy Hubaut; Romain Guichard; Julia Greenfield; Mathias Blandeau
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.