Literature DB >> 2112063

A comparison of diagnostic tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca: lactoplate, Schirmer, and tear osmolarity.

J A Lucca1, J N Nunez, R L Farris.   

Abstract

We compared diagnostic tests for keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in previously diagnosed patients and normal controls to determine the incidence of true negatives (specificity) and true positives (sensitivity). Tear osmolarity testing, the Schirmer filter paper test, and lactoferrin determination by the Lactoplate radial immunodiffusion (RID) method were performed in 20 KCS patients diagnosed on the basis of presenting symptoms and clinical examination. Similar determinations were performed in 20 age- and sex-matched normal control subjects. Mean lactoferrin concentrations in the right eyes of the KCS patients and normal controls were 134 +/- 78 (+/- 1 SD) mg/dL and 118 +/- 56 mg/dL, respectively. Tear osmolarity was 323 +/- 12 mosm/L and 306 +/- 7 mosm/L, in KCS patients and normal controls, respectively. The Schirmer test yielded a mean of 2.4 +/- 1.8 mm/minute of wetting in the KCS patients and 3.0 +/- 1.4 mm/minute in the controls. Used as a diagnostic test, lactoferrin determination by RID was found to have 35% sensitivity and 70% specificity; tear osmolarity determination had 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity; and the Schirmer test yielded 25% sensitivity and 90% specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2112063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CLAO J        ISSN: 0733-8902


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic usefulness and cutoff value of Schirmer's I test in the Japanese diagnostic criteria of dry eye.

Authors:  Y Danjo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  New testing options for diagnosing and grading dry eye disease.

Authors:  Gary N Foulks; Stephen C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Corneal epithelial thickness profile in dry-eye disease.

Authors:  Mohamed Abou Shousha; Jianhua Wang; George Kontadakis; William Feuer; Ana P Canto; Rodrigo Hoffmann; Victor L Perez
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Simultaneous evaluation of tear turnover and corneal epithelial permeability by fluorophotometry in normal subjects and patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS).

Authors:  J D Nelson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1995

5.  Comparison of low-abundance biomarker levels in capillary-collected nonstimulated tears and washout tears of aqueous-deficient and normal patients.

Authors:  Nicole Guyette; Larezia Williams; My-Tho Tran; Tammy Than; John Bradley; Lucy Kehinde; Clara Edwards; Mark Beasley; Roderick Fullard
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Tear osmolarity in Sjögren syndrome.

Authors:  Vatinee Y Bunya; Nicole Langelier; Sarah Chen; Maxwell Pistilli; Frederick B Vivino; Giacomina Massaro-Giordano
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Tear Film Osmolarity in Subjects with Acute Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Eirini Nitoda; Anastasios Lavaris; Konstantinos Laios; Sophia Androudi; Chris D Kalogeropoulos; Michael Tsatsos; Christos Damaskos; Nikolaos Garmpis; Marilita M Moschos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Evaluation of ocular surface disease in elderly patients with glaucoma: expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in tears.

Authors:  Dai Woo Kim; Je Hyun Seo; Su-Ho Lim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Dry eye disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus; comparison of the tear osmolarity test with other common diagnostic tests: a diagnostic accuracy study using STARD standard.

Authors:  Laily Najafi; Mojtaba Malek; Ameneh Ebrahim Valojerdi; Mohammad E Khamseh; Hossein Aghaei
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 10.  Dry Eye Management: Targeting the Ocular Surface Microenvironment.

Authors:  Xiaobo Zhang; Vimalin Jeyalatha M; Yangluowa Qu; Xin He; Shangkun Ou; Jinghua Bu; Changkai Jia; Junqi Wang; Han Wu; Zuguo Liu; Wei Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.