Literature DB >> 21120353

Armadillo meat intake was not associated with leprosy in a case control study, Curitiba (Brazil).

Juliano Vilaverde Schmitt1, Ivone Tod Dechandt, Gisele Dopke, Maria Luiza Ribas, Felipe Bochnia Cerci, Juliana Maria Zucco Viesi, Helena Zenedin Marchioro, Mariana Martins Bardou Zunino, Hélio Amante Miot.   

Abstract

Leprosy's progression and its maintained endemic status, despite the availability of effective treatments, are not fully understood and recent studies have highlighted the possibility of involved Mycobacterium leprae ambient reservoirs. Wild armadillos can carry leprosy and, because their meat is eaten by humans, development of the disease among armadillo meat consumers has been investigated. This study evaluated the frequency of armadillo meat intake among leprosy patients as well as age and gender matched controls with other skin diseases from a dermatological unit. Armadillo meat consumption among both groups was adjusted by demographic and socioeconomic covariates based on a conditional multiple logistic regression model. One hundred twenty-one cases and 242 controls were evaluated; they differed in socioeconomic variables such as family income, hometown population and access to treated water. The multivariate analysis did not show an association between the intake of armadillo meat and leprosy (odds ratio = 1.07; CI 95% 0.56-2.04), even when only cases with no known contacts were analyzed. We conclude that leprosy is not associated with the intake of armadillo meat in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21120353     DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762010000700003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz        ISSN: 0074-0276            Impact factor:   2.743


  6 in total

Review 1.  Leprosy in the 21st century.

Authors:  Cassandra White; Carlos Franco-Paredes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tanja A J Houweling; Henrike E Karim-Kos; Margarete C Kulik; Wilma A Stolk; Juanita A Haagsma; Edeltraud J Lenk; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Sake J de Vlas
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-05-12

3.  Evidence of zoonotic leprosy in Pará, Brazilian Amazon, and risks associated with human contact or consumption of armadillos.

Authors:  Moises B da Silva; Juliana M Portela; Wei Li; Mary Jackson; Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero; Andrea Sánchez Hidalgo; John T Belisle; Raquel C Bouth; Angélica R Gobbo; Josafá G Barreto; Antonio H H Minervino; Stewart T Cole; Charlotte Avanzi; Philippe Busso; Marco A C Frade; Annemieke Geluk; Claudio G Salgado; John S Spencer
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-06-28

4.  Social and environmental conditions related to Mycobacterium leprae infection in children and adolescents from three leprosy endemic regions of Colombia.

Authors:  Héctor Serrano-Coll; Hugo Rene Mora; Juan Camilo Beltrán; Malcolm S Duthie; Nora Cardona-Castro
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Reservoirs and transmission routes of leprosy; A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Ploemacher; William R Faber; Henk Menke; Victor Rutten; Toine Pieters
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-04-27

6.  Trends of the leprosy control indicators in Benin from 2006 to 2018.

Authors:  Ronald Sètondji Gnimavo; Parfait Djossou; Ghislain Emmanuel Sopoh; Gimatal Esaï Anagonou; Yves Thierry Barogui; Akpéédjé Anita Carolle Wadagni; Jean-Gabin Houezo; Roch Christian Johnson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.