Literature DB >> 21119342

Evaluation of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-based sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients at a tertiary academic medical center.

Kevin E Anger1, Paul M Szumita, Steven A Baroletti, Matthew J Labreche, John Fanikos.   

Abstract

Management of pain and sedation therapy is a vital component of optimizing patient outcomes; however, the ideal pharmacotherapy regimen has not been identified in the postoperative cardiac surgery population. We sought to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes between postoperative mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients receiving dexmedetomidine versus propofol therapy upon arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a single center, descriptive study of clinical practice at a 20-bed cardiac surgery ICU in a tertiary academic medical center. Adult mechanically ventilated postcardiac surgery patients who received either dexmedetomidine or propofol for sedation therapy upon admission to the ICU between October 20, 2006 and December 15, 2006 were evaluated. A pharmacy database was used to identify patients receiving dexmedetomidine or propofol therapy for perioperative sedation during cardiac surgery. Patients were matched according to surgical procedure type. Fifty-six patients who received either dexmedetomidine (n = 28) or propofol (n = 28) were included in the analysis. No differences in the ICU length of stay (58.67 ± 32.61 vs. 61 ± 33.1 hours; P = 0.79) and duration of mechanical ventilation (16.21 ± 6.05 vs. 13.97 ± 4.62 hours; P = 0.13) were seen between the propofol and dexmedetomidine groups, respectively. Hypotension (17 [61%] vs. 9 [32%]; P = 0.04), morphine use (11 [39.3%] vs. 1 [3.6%]; P = 0.002), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use (7 [25%] vs. 1 [3.6%]; P = 0.05) occurred more during dexmedetomidine therapy versus propofol. Dexmedetomidine therapy resulted in a higher incidence of hypotension and analgesic consumption compared with propofol-based sedation therapy. Further evaluation is needed to assess differences in clinical outcomes of propofol and dexmedetomidine-based therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21119342     DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181f4ec4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol        ISSN: 1535-2811


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Wanat; Kalliopi Fitousis; Fariedeh Boston; Faisal Masud
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  Clinical and economic impact of substituting dexmedetomidine for propofol due to a US drug shortage: examination of coronary artery bypass graft patients at an urban medical centre.

Authors:  Brandi N Thoma; Julius Li; Cara M McDaniel; Cindy J Wordell; Nicholas Cavarocchi; Laura T Pizzi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on sedation in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a fast-track recovery room setting.

Authors:  Yucel Karaman; Burcin Abud; Zeki Tuncel Tekgul; Meltem Cakmak; Murside Yildiz; Mustafa Gonullu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Predictors of severe hypotension in neurocritical care patients sedated with propofol.

Authors:  G Morgan Jones; Bruce A Doepker; Michael J Erdman; Lauren A Kimmons; Lucas Elijovich
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Dexmedetomidine: a review of applications for cardiac surgery during perioperative period.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Xuan Zhao; Yingwei Wang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  The relationship between sedative drug utilization and outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Kenshi Hayashida; Takeshi Umegaki; Hiroshi Ikai; Genki Murakami; Masaji Nishimura; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Dexmedetomidine in the cardiac intensive care unit: still no simple answers to a complex problem.

Authors:  Alessandro Sionis; Jordi Sans-Rosello
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2021-05-25

8.  Effects of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine maintenance infusion in posterior spinal fusion surgery on acute postoperative pain.

Authors:  Nasim Nikoubakht; Mahzad Alimian; Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz; Pooya Derakhshan; Mohammad Saleh Sadri
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-04-26

9.  Can dexmedetomidine be a safe and efficacious sedative agent in post-cardiac surgery patients? a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Yun Lin; Bin He; Jian Chen; Zhi Nong Wang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for postoperative sedation in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Authors:  S R Chorney; M E Gooch; M T Oberdier; D Keating; R F Stahl
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.