Literature DB >> 21118955

In vivo characterization of MMP-2200, a mixed δ/μ opioid agonist, in mice.

John J Lowery1, Tyler J Raymond, Denise Giuvelis, Jean M Bidlack, Robin Polt, Edward J Bilsky.   

Abstract

We have previously reported the chemistry and antinociceptive properties of a series of glycosylated enkephalin analogs (glycopeptides) exhibiting approximately equal affinity and efficacy at δ opioid receptors (DORs) and μ opioid receptors (MORs). More detailed pharmacology of the lead glycopeptide MMP-2200 [H₂N-Tyr-D-Thr-Gly-Phe-Leu-Ser-(O-β-D-lactose)-CONH₂] is presented. MMP-2200 produced dose-related antinociception in the 55°C tail-flick assay after various routes of administration. The antinociceptive effects of MMP-2200 were blocked by pretreatment with the general opioid antagonist naloxone and partially blocked by the MOR-selective antagonist β-funaltrexamine and the DOR-selective antagonist naltrindole. The κ opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine and the peripherally active opioid antagonist naloxone-methiodide were ineffective in blocking the antinociceptive effects of MMP-2200. At equi-antinociceptive doses, MMP-2200 produced significantly less stimulation of locomotor activity compared with morphine. Repeated administration of equivalent doses of morphine and MMP-2200 (twice daily for 3 days) produced antinociceptive tolerance (~13- and 5-fold rightward shifts, respectively). In acute and chronic physical dependence assays, naloxone precipitated a more severe withdrawal in mice receiving morphine compared with equivalent doses of the glycopeptide. Both morphine and MMP-2200 inhibited respiration and gastrointestinal transit. In summary, MMP-2200 acts as a mixed DOR/MOR agonist in vivo, which may in part account for its high antinociceptive potency after systemic administration, as well as its decreased propensity to produce locomotor stimulation, tolerance, and physical dependence in mice, compared with the MOR-selective agonist morphine. For other measures (e.g., gastrointestinal transit and respiration), the significant MOR component may not allow differentiation from morphine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21118955      PMCID: PMC3061528          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.110.172866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  38 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal motor effects of corticotropin-releasing factor in mice.

Authors:  R J Sheldon; J A Qi; F Porreca; L A Fisher
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  1990-04-24

2.  Delta-opioid ligands reverse alfentanil-induced respiratory depression but not antinociception.

Authors:  Y F Su; R W McNutt; K J Chang
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Direct dependence studies in rats with agents selective for different types of opioid receptor.

Authors:  A Cowan; X Z Zhu; H I Mosberg; J R Omnaas; F Porreca
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Estimation of the affinity of naloxone at supraspinal and spinal opioid receptors in vivo: studies with receptor selective agonists.

Authors:  J S Heyman; R J Koslo; H I Mosberg; R J Tallarida; F Porreca
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1986-11-10       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Multiple opiate receptor sites on primary afferent fibres.

Authors:  H L Fields; P C Emson; B K Leigh; R F Gilbert; L L Iversen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mu antagonist and kappa agonist properties of b-funaltrexamine (b-FNA): long lasting spinal antinociception.

Authors:  Q Jiang; J S Heyman; F Porreca
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1989

8.  Roles of mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in spinal and supraspinal mediation of gastrointestinal transit effects and hot-plate analgesia in the mouse.

Authors:  F Porreca; H I Mosberg; R Hurst; V J Hruby; T F Burks
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Analgesic synergy and improved motor function produced by combinations of mu-delta- and mu-kappa-opioids.

Authors:  K A Sutters; C Miaskowski; Y O Taiwo; J D Levine
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Extremely long-lasting antagonistic actions of nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) in the mouse tail-flick test.

Authors:  P Horan; J Taylor; H I Yamamura; F Porreca
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Opioid glycopeptide analgesics derived from endogenous enkephalins and endorphins.

Authors:  Yingxue Li; Mark R Lefever; Dhanasekaran Muthu; Jean M Bidlack; Edward J Bilsky; Robin Polt
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.808

2.  Antinociceptive effects of the 6-O-sulfate ester of morphine in normal and diabetic rats: Comparative role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Jai Shankar K Yadlapalli; Benjamin M Ford; Amit Ketkar; Anqi Wan; Narasimha R Penthala; Robert L Eoff; Paul L Prather; Maxim Dobretsov; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  Opioid peptidomimetics: leads for the design of bioavailable mixed efficacy μ opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/δ opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist ligands.

Authors:  Henry I Mosberg; Larisa Yeomans; Aubrie A Harland; Aaron M Bender; Katarzyna Sobczyk-Kojiro; Jessica P Anand; Mary J Clark; Emily M Jutkiewicz; John R Traynor
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  A Novel Mu-Delta Opioid Agonist Demonstrates Enhanced Efficacy With Reduced Tolerance and Dependence in Mouse Neuropathic Pain Models.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Rakesh H Vekariya; Subramaniam Ananthan; John M Streicher
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Delta/mu opioid receptor interactions in operant conditioning assays of pain-depressed responding and drug-induced rate suppression: assessment of therapeutic index in male Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Katherine Cone; Janell Lanpher; Abigail Kinens; Philomena Richard; Sarah Couture; Rebecca Brackin; Emily Payne; Kylee Harrington; Kenner C Rice; Glenn W Stevenson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Translation of structure-activity relationships from cyclic mixed efficacy opioid peptides to linear analogues.

Authors:  Jessica P Anand; Vanessa R Porter-Barrus; Helen V Waldschmidt; Larisa Yeomans; Irina D Pogozheva; John R Traynor; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Behavioral and cellular pharmacology characterization of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-(isoquinoline-3'-carboxamido)morphinan (NAQ) as a mu opioid receptor selective ligand.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Amanda Braithwaite; Yunyun Yuan; John M Streicher; Edward J Bilsky
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Synthesis, modeling, and pharmacological evaluation of UMB 425, a mixed μ agonist/δ antagonist opioid analgesic with reduced tolerance liabilities.

Authors:  Jason R Healy; Padmavani Bezawada; Jihyun Shim; Jace W Jones; Maureen A Kane; Alexander D MacKerell; Andrew Coop; Rae R Matsumoto
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.418

9.  Opioid Peptides: Potential for Drug Development.

Authors:  Jane V Aldrich; Jay P McLaughlin
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2012

10.  Synthesis and evaluation of 4-substituted piperidines and piperazines as balanced affinity μ opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/δ opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist ligands.

Authors:  Aaron M Bender; Mary J Clark; Michael P Agius; John R Traynor; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.