BACKGROUND: Malaria is a leading global cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, despite recent advances in treatment and prevention technologies. Scale-up and wide distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) could rapidly decrease malarial disease in endemic areas, if used properly and continuously. Studies have shown that effective use of LLINs depends, in part, upon understanding causal factors associated with malaria. This study examined malaria beliefs, attitudes, and practices toward LLINs assessed during a large-scale integrated prevention campaign (IPC) in rural Kenya. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 34 IPC participants who received LLINs as part of a comprehensive prevention package of goods and services. One month after distribution, interviewers asked these individuals about their attitudes and beliefs regarding malaria, and about their use of LLINs. RESULTS: Virtually all participants noted that mosquitoes were involved in causing malaria, though a substantial proportion of participants (47 percent) also mentioned an incorrect cause in addition to mosquitoes. For example, participants commonly noted that the weather (rain, cold) or consumption of bad food and water caused malaria. Regardless, most participants used the LLINs they were given and most mentioned positive benefits from their use, namely reductions in malarial illness and in the costs associated with its diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward LLINs were positive in this rural community in Western Kenya, and respondents noted benefits with LLIN use. With improved understanding and clarification of the direct (mosquitoes) and indirect (e.g., standing water) causes of malaria, it is likely that LLIN use can be sustained, offering effective household-level protection against malaria.
BACKGROUND:Malaria is a leading global cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, despite recent advances in treatment and prevention technologies. Scale-up and wide distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) could rapidly decrease malarial disease in endemic areas, if used properly and continuously. Studies have shown that effective use of LLINs depends, in part, upon understanding causal factors associated with malaria. This study examined malaria beliefs, attitudes, and practices toward LLINs assessed during a large-scale integrated prevention campaign (IPC) in rural Kenya. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 34 IPC participants who received LLINs as part of a comprehensive prevention package of goods and services. One month after distribution, interviewers asked these individuals about their attitudes and beliefs regarding malaria, and about their use of LLINs. RESULTS: Virtually all participants noted that mosquitoes were involved in causing malaria, though a substantial proportion of participants (47 percent) also mentioned an incorrect cause in addition to mosquitoes. For example, participants commonly noted that the weather (rain, cold) or consumption of bad food and water caused malaria. Regardless, most participants used the LLINs they were given and most mentioned positive benefits from their use, namely reductions in malarial illness and in the costs associated with its diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward LLINs were positive in this rural community in Western Kenya, and respondents noted benefits with LLIN use. With improved understanding and clarification of the direct (mosquitoes) and indirect (e.g., standing water) causes of malaria, it is likely that LLIN use can be sustained, offering effective household-level protection against malaria.
Authors: Eric Lugada; Debra Millar; John Haskew; Mark Grabowsky; Navneet Garg; Mikkel Vestergaard; James G Kahn; James G Khan; James Kahn; Nicholas Muraguri; Jonathan Mermin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bernard A Okech; Isaac K Mwobobia; Anthony Kamau; Samuel Muiruri; Noah Mutiso; Joyce Nyambura; Cassian Mwatele; Teruaki Amano; Charles S Mwandawiro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Patricia M Graves; Jeremiah M Ngondi; Jimee Hwang; Asefaw Getachew; Teshome Gebre; Aryc W Mosher; Amy E Patterson; Estifanos B Shargie; Zerihun Tadesse; Adam Wolkon; Richard Reithinger; Paul M Emerson; Frank O Richards Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Desta Ayode; Abebayehu Tora; David Farrell; Getnet Tadele; Gail Davey; Colleen M McBride Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: James G Kahn; Brian Harris; Jonathan H Mermin; Thomas Clasen; Eric Lugada; Mark Grabowksy; Mikkel Vestergaard Frandsen; Navneet Garg Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Timothy De Ver Dye; Rose Apondi; Eric Lugada; James G Kahn; Mary Ann Sandiford-Day; Tania Dasbanerjee Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ruth A Ashton; Takele Kefyalew; Gezahegn Tesfaye; Rachel L Pullan; Damtew Yadeta; Richard Reithinger; Jan H Kolaczinski; Simon Brooker Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Netta Beer; Abdullah S Ali; Helena Eskilsson; Andreas Jansson; Faiza M Abdul-Kadir; Guida Rotllant-Estelrich; Ali K Abass; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Anders Björkman; Karin Källander Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Viviane Hélène Matong Tchinda; Antoine Socpa; Aubin Armand Keundo; Francis Zeukeng; Clovis Tiogang Seumen; Rose Gana Fomban Leke; Roger Somo Moyou Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2012-08-31
Authors: Ashis Das; R K Das Gupta; Jed Friedman; Madan M Pradhan; Charu C Mohapatra; Debakanta Sandhibigraha Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Netta Beer; Abdullah S Ali; Delér Shakely; Kristina Elfving; Abdul-Wahiyd H Al-Mafazy; Mwinyi Msellem; Max Petzold; Anders Björkman; Karin Källander Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 2.979