Literature DB >> 21117949

Density dependence slows invader spread in fragmented landscapes.

Elizaveta Pachepsky1, Jonathan M Levine.   

Abstract

Patchiness is a defining characteristic of most natural and anthropogenic habitats, yet much of our understanding of how invasions spread has come from models of spatially homogeneous environments. Except for populations with Allee effects, an invader's growth rate when rare and dispersal determine its spread velocity; intraspecific competition has little to no influence. How this result might change with landscape patchiness, however, is poorly understood. We used simulation models and their analytical approximations to explore the effect of density dependence on the spread of annual plant invaders moving through heterogeneous landscapes with gaps in suitable habitat. We found that landscape patchiness and discrete invader population size interacted to generate a strong role for density dependence. Intraspecific competition greatly slowed the spread of invasions through patchy landscapes by regulating how rapidly a population could produce enough seeds to surpass habitat gaps. Populations with continuously varying density showed no such effect of density dependence. We adapted a stochastic dispersal model to approximate spread when gap sizes were small relative to the mean dispersal distance and a Markov chain approximation for landscapes with large gaps. Our work suggests that ecologists must consider reproduction at both low and high densities when predicting invader spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117949     DOI: 10.1086/657438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  Weak conspecific feedbacks and exotic dominance in a species-rich savannah.

Authors:  Andrew S MacDougall; Matthias C Rillig; John N Klironomos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Density dependence in demography and dispersal generates fluctuating invasion speeds.

Authors:  Lauren L Sullivan; Bingtuan Li; Tom E X Miller; Michael G Neubert; Allison K Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Plant invasions and extinction debts.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Gene swamping alters evolution during range expansions in the protist Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Felix Moerman; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Andreas Wagner; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks during experimental range expansions.

Authors:  Emanuel A Fronhofer; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates.

Authors:  Jens-Christian Svenning; Dominique Gravel; Robert D Holt; Frank M Schurr; Wilfried Thuiller; Tamara Münkemüller; Katja H Schiffers; Stefan Dullinger; Thomas C Edwards; Thomas Hickler; Steven I Higgins; Julia E M S Nabel; Jörn Pagel; Signe Normand
Journal:  Ecography       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Spatial Competition: Roughening of an Experimental Interface.

Authors:  Andrew J Allstadt; Jonathan A Newman; Jonathan A Walter; G Korniss; Thomas Caraco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.