Literature DB >> 21116951

Considerations when submitting nanotherapeutics to FDA/CDER for regulatory review.

Katherine Tyner1, Nakissa Sadrieh.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not, as yet, have specific guidances for products containing nanoscale materials. As announced in the report issued by the FDA Nanotechnology Task Force (July 2007), however, there are recommendations to various centers within the FDA to develop guidances for industry. Regardless of the lack of explicit FDA guidances, there are therapeutics currently on the market containing nanoscale materials, and additional novel nanomaterial-containing therapeutics are being developed with the hopes of being submitted for regulatory review and approval. While, for the most part, these novel nanomaterial-containing products are being evaluated using the same regulatory requirements as products that do not contain nanomaterials, it is increasingly evident that at least in the area of characterization of nanomaterials used in drug products, there may be areas where special focus is needed. Specific areas include the validity of applying small molecule principles and methodologies to nanomaterial-containing products, the effects the nanomaterial will impart to the rest of the formulation (or vice versa), and how the physicochemical properties may be impacted by biological settings. Similarly, for safety evaluation, biodistribution studies will be at the core of any evaluation of products containing nanomaterials. These biodistribution studies will, in effect, be indicative of where the nanoparticles are traveling and possibly accumulating, therefore subjecting those sites to increased likelihood of toxicological effects. This chapter focuses on questions and considerations that may arise for sponsors during product characterization, as well as considerations for the appropriate design and conduct of in vivo toxicology studies. This chapter will also review how current FDA guidances apply to nanotherapeutics.This chapter reflects the current thinking and experience of the authors. However, this is not a policy document and should not be used in lieu of regulations, published FDA guidances, or direct discussions with the agency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21116951     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  14 in total

Review 1.  Best practices in cancer nanotechnology: perspective from NCI nanotechnology alliance.

Authors:  William C Zamboni; Vladimir Torchilin; Anil K Patri; Jeff Hrkach; Stephen Stern; Robert Lee; Andre Nel; Nicholas J Panaro; Piotr Grodzinski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Lipid nanoparticles with minimum burst release of TNF-α siRNA show strong activity against rheumatoid arthritis unresponsive to methotrexate.

Authors:  Abdulaziz M Aldayel; Hannah L O'Mary; Solange A Valdes; Xu Li; Sachin G Thakkar; Bahar E Mustafa; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Nanomaterial Drug Products: Manufacturing and Analytical Perspectives.

Authors:  Christie M Sayes; Grace V Aquino; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  The evolving landscape of drug products containing nanomaterials in the United States.

Authors:  Sheetal R D'Mello; Celia N Cruz; Mei-Ling Chen; Mamta Kapoor; Sau L Lee; Katherine M Tyner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Design and self-assembly of siRNA-functionalized RNA nanoparticles for use in automated nanomedicine.

Authors:  Kirill A Afonin; Wade W Grabow; Faye M Walker; Eckart Bindewald; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Bruce A Shapiro; Luc Jaeger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Opportunities, Barriers, and a Strategy for Overcoming Translational Challenges to Therapeutic Nucleic Acid Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Kirill A Afonin; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; George Church; Mark Bathe
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Understanding the correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunotoxicity tests for nanomedicines.

Authors:  Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Microparticles bearing encephalitogenic peptides induce T-cell tolerance and ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Daniel R Getts; Aaron J Martin; Derrick P McCarthy; Rachael L Terry; Zoe N Hunter; Woon Teck Yap; Meghann Teague Getts; Michael Pleiss; Xunrong Luo; Nicholas J C King; Lonnie D Shea; Stephen D Miller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Current understanding of interactions between nanoparticles and the immune system.

Authors:  Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Michael Shurin; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Biotargeted nanomedicines for cancer: six tenets before you begin.

Authors:  Michael S Goldberg; Sara S Hook; Andrew Z Wang; Jeff W M Bulte; Anil K Patri; Fatih M Uckun; Vincent L Cryns; Justin Hanes; Demir Akin; Jennifer B Hall; Nastaran Gharkholo; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.