Literature DB >> 21115513

When could global warming reach 4°C?

Richard A Betts1, Matthew Collins, Deborah L Hemming, Chris D Jones, Jason A Lowe, Michael G Sanderson.   

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) assessed a range of scenarios of future greenhouse-gas emissions without policies to specifically reduce emissions, and concluded that these would lead to an increase in global mean temperatures of between 1.6°C and 6.9°C by the end of the twenty-first century, relative to pre-industrial. While much political attention is focused on the potential for global warming of 2°C relative to pre-industrial, the AR4 projections clearly suggest that much greater levels of warming are possible by the end of the twenty-first century in the absence of mitigation. The centre of the range of AR4-projected global warming was approximately 4°C. The higher end of the projected warming was associated with the higher emissions scenarios and models, which included stronger carbon-cycle feedbacks. The highest emissions scenario considered in the AR4 (scenario A1FI) was not examined with complex general circulation models (GCMs) in the AR4, and similarly the uncertainties in climate-carbon-cycle feedbacks were not included in the main set of GCMs. Consequently, the projections of warming for A1FI and/or with different strengths of carbon-cycle feedbacks are often not included in a wider discussion of the AR4 conclusions. While it is still too early to say whether any particular scenario is being tracked by current emissions, A1FI is considered to be as plausible as other non-mitigation scenarios and cannot be ruled out. (A1FI is a part of the A1 family of scenarios, with 'FI' standing for 'fossil intensive'. This is sometimes erroneously written as A1F1, with number 1 instead of letter I.) This paper presents simulations of climate change with an ensemble of GCMs driven by the A1FI scenario, and also assesses the implications of carbon-cycle feedbacks for the climate-change projections. Using these GCM projections along with simple climate-model projections, including uncertainties in carbon-cycle feedbacks, and also comparing against other model projections from the IPCC, our best estimate is that the A1FI emissions scenario would lead to a warming of 4°C relative to pre-industrial during the 2070s. If carbon-cycle feedbacks are stronger, which appears less likely but still credible, then 4°C warming could be reached by the early 2060s in projections that are consistent with the IPCC's 'likely range'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21115513     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  9 in total

1.  The 2 °C global warming effect on summer European tourism through different indices.

Authors:  Manolis G Grillakis; Aristeidis G Koutroulis; Ioannis K Tsanis
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Potential effect of atmospheric warming on grapevine phenology and post-harvest heat accumulation across a range of climates.

Authors:  Andrew Hall; Adam J Mathews; Bruno P Holzapfel
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Time to evolve? Potential evolutionary responses of fraser river sockeye salmon to climate change and effects on persistence.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Daniel E Schindler; Merran J Hague; David A Patterson; Eli Meir; Robin S Waples; Scott G Hinch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Eucalypts face increasing climate stress.

Authors:  Nathalie Butt; Laura J Pollock; Clive A McAlpine
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  A hierarchical bayesian model to quantify uncertainty of stream water temperature forecasts.

Authors:  Guillaume Bal; Etienne Rivot; Jean-Luc Baglinière; Jonathan White; Etienne Prévost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of habitat suitability for the Ethiopian staple crop, Eragrostis tef (teff), under changing climate.

Authors:  Dinka Zewudie; Wenguang Ding; Zhanlei Rong; Chuanyan Zhao; Yapeng Chang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Experimental Warming Hastens Physical Dormancy Break and Germination in Tropical Fabaceae.

Authors:  Ganesh K Jaganathan; Matthew Biddick
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Two interacting ethylene response factors regulate heat stress response.

Authors:  Jianyan Huang; Xiaobo Zhao; Marco Bürger; Yurong Wang; Joanne Chory
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Modelling shifts in agroclimate and crop cultivar response under climate change.

Authors:  Reimund P Rötter; Jukka Höhn; Mirek Trnka; Stefan Fronzek; Timothy R Carter; Helena Kahiluoto
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.