Literature DB >> 21115456

Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: Phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Michael L Corrado1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) requires therapy that is effective against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including resistant pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Equally important is the need to provide therapy that is safe and well tolerated. Ceftaroline fosamil is a new-generation, parenteral cephalosporin that was developed for the treatment of moderate to severe bacterial infections, including cSSSIs. This report provides an integrated safety summary of the CeftAroliNe Versus VAncomycin in Skin and Skin Structure Infections (CANVAS) 1 and 2 studies (registration numbers NCT00424190 and NCT00423657).
METHODS: Adult patients with cSSSIs requiring intravenous therapy received 600 mg of ceftaroline fosamil every 12 h or 1 g of vancomycin plus 1 g of aztreonam every 12 h for 5-14 days (randomized 1 : 1). All patients were followed for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring from the start of the initial study drug infusion up to the test-of-cure visit, ∼1 week following the last dose of study medication; serious adverse events (SAEs) that occurred within 30 days after the last dose were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 1378 patients received any amount of study drug and were included in the safety analysis. The percentage of patients with an SAE was similar between the ceftaroline fosamil and the vancomycin plus aztreonam groups (4.3% versus 4.1%). The majority of patients (>75%) had either no or mild TEAEs and the distribution of TEAEs based on severity was comparable between the groups. The most commonly reported TEAEs in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil included nausea (5.9%), headache (5.2%), diarrhoea (4.9%) and pruritus (3.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated and did not result in any unexpected safety concerns. The data from the CANVAS trials suggest that ceftaroline fosamil has the expected safety and tolerability profile common to the cephalosporin class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21115456     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  22 in total

Review 1.  Ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Donald E Low
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Ceftaroline fosamil: a review of its use in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections and community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Safety, local tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline fosamil administered in a reduced infusion volume.

Authors:  Timi Edeki; Mirjana Kujacic; Helen Broadhurst; Jianguo Li; Maria Sunzel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Evaluation of ceftaroline activity versus daptomycin (DAP) against DAP-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Molly Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Vancomycin and the Risk of AKI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abhisekh Sinha Ray; Ammar Haikal; Kassem A Hammoud; Alan S L Yu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  A critical review on the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials of ceftaroline.

Authors:  Tony K L Kiang; Kyle J Wilby; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D L Paterson; T P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Madison K Bangert; Rodrigo Hasbun
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Cutaneous infections and infestations: new therapies.

Authors:  Emily C Keller; Kenneth J Tomecki
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2011-12

10.  Evaluation of the effect of a supratherapeutic dose of intravenous ceftaroline fosamil on the corrected QT interval.

Authors:  Todd A Riccobene; Ludmyla Rekeda; Douglas Rank; Lily Llorens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.