Literature DB >> 21114349

Counterfactual potency.

John V Petrocelli1, Elise J Percy, Steven J Sherman, Zakary L Tormala.   

Abstract

Counterfactual thoughts typically take the form of implied or explicit if-then statements. We propose that the multiplicative combination of "if likelihood" (the degree to which the antecedent condition of the counterfactual is perceived to be likely) and "then likelihood" (the perceived conditional likelihood of the outcome of the counterfactual, given the antecedent condition) determine the strength and impact of counterfactuals. This construct, termed counterfactual potency, is a reliable predictor of the degree of influence of counterfactual thinking upon judgments of regret, causation, and responsibility. Through 4 studies, we demonstrate the predictive power of this construct in a variety of contexts and show that it plays a causal role in determining the strength of the effects of counterfactual thought. Implications of counterfactual potency as a central factor of counterfactual influence are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21114349     DOI: 10.1037/a0021523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  When contributions make a difference: explaining order effects in responsibility attribution.

Authors:  Tobias Gerstenberg; David A Lagnado
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near-misses: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Eric van Dijk; Hong Li; Michael Aitken; Luke Clark
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2017-04-03

3.  Finding fault: causality and counterfactuals in group attributions.

Authors:  Ro'i Zultan; Tobias Gerstenberg; David A Lagnado
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-09-05

Review 4.  Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning.

Authors:  Nicole Van Hoeck; Patrick D Watson; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Pitfalls of counterfactual thinking in medical practice: preventing errors by using more functional reference points.

Authors:  John V Petrocelli
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2013-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.