Literature DB >> 21113385

A Spatio-Temporal Downscaler for Output From Numerical Models.

Veronica J Berrocal1, Alan E Gelfand, David M Holland.   

Abstract

Often, in environmental data collection, data arise from two sources: numerical models and monitoring networks. The first source provides predictions at the level of grid cells, while the second source gives measurements at points. The first is characterized by full spatial coverage of the region of interest, high temporal resolution, no missing data but consequential calibration concerns. The second tends to be sparsely collected in space with coarser temporal resolution, often with missing data but, where recorded, provides, essentially, the true value. Accommodating the spatial misalignment between the two types of data is of fundamental importance for both improved predictions of exposure as well as for evaluation and calibration of the numerical model. In this article we propose a simple, fully model-based strategy to downscale the output from numerical models to point level. The static spatial model, specified within a Bayesian framework, regresses the observed data on the numerical model output using spatially-varying coefficients which are specified through a correlated spatial Gaussian process.As an example, we apply our method to ozone concentration data for the eastern U.S. and compare it to Bayesian melding (Fuentes and Raftery 2005) and ordinary kriging (Cressie 1993; Chilès and Delfiner 1999). Our results show that our method outperforms Bayesian melding in terms of computing speed and it is superior to both Bayesian melding and ordinary kriging in terms of predictive performance; predictions obtained with our method are better calibrated and predictive intervals have empirical coverage closer to the nominal values. Moreover, our model can be easily extended to accommodate for the temporal dimension. In this regard, we consider several spatio-temporal versions of the static model. We compare them using out-of-sample predictions of ozone concentration for the eastern U.S. for the period May 1-October 15, 2001. For the best choice, we present a summary of the analysis. Supplemental material, including color versions of Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and MCMC diagnostic plots, are available online.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113385      PMCID: PMC2990198          DOI: 10.1007/s13253-009-0004-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat        ISSN: 1085-7117            Impact factor:   1.524


  3 in total

1.  Air quality and pediatric emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Authors:  P E Tolbert; J A Mulholland; D L MacIntosh; F Xu; D Daniels; O J Devine; B P Carlin; M Klein; J Dorley; A J Butler; D F Nordenberg; H Frumkin; P B Ryan; M C White
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Model evaluation and spatial interpolation by Bayesian combination of observations with outputs from numerical models.

Authors:  Montserrat Fuentes; Adrian E Raftery
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Spatial association between speciated fine particles and mortality.

Authors:  Montserrat Fuentes; Hae-Ryoung Song; Sujit K Ghosh; David M Holland; Jerry M Davis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total
  60 in total

1.  A spatially varying distributed lag model with application to an air pollution and term low birth weight study.

Authors:  Joshua L Warren; Thomas J Luben; Howard H Chang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.864

2.  Calibrating MODIS aerosol optical depth for predicting daily PM2.5 concentrations via statistical downscaling.

Authors:  Howard H Chang; Xuefei Hu; Yang Liu
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  A Flexible Spatio-Temporal Model for Air Pollution with Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Covariates.

Authors:  Johan Lindström; Adam A Szpiro; Paul D Sampson; Assaf P Oron; Mark Richards; Tim V Larson; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.119

4.  A Bayesian ensemble approach to combine PM2.5 estimates from statistical models using satellite imagery and numerical model simulation.

Authors:  Nancy L Murray; Heather A Holmes; Yang Liu; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Independent and joint contributions of economic, social and physical environmental characteristics to mortality in the Detroit Metropolitan Area: A study of cumulative effects and pathways.

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Amel Omari; Melanie Ward; Graciela B Mentz; Ricardo Demajo; Natalie Sampson; Barbara A Israel; Angela G Reyes; Donele Wilkins
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Extreme value analysis for evaluating ozone control strategies.

Authors:  Brian Reich; Daniel Cooley; Kristen Foley; Sergey Napelenok; Benjamin Shaby
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Bayesian Modeling and Analysis of Geostatistical Data.

Authors:  Alan E Gelfand; Sudipto Banerjee
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  A class of covariate-dependent spatiotemporal covariance functions.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Jo Eidsvik; Michele Guindani; Amy J Nail; Alexandra M Schmidt
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration.

Authors:  Veronica J Berrocal; Yawen Guan; Amanda Muyskens; Haoyu Wang; Brian J Reich; James A Mulholland; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  A spectral method for spatial downscaling.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Howard H Chang; Kristen M Foley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.