BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has evolved over the last decade into an indispensable diagnostic instrument. CMR imaging noninvasively provides structural, functional and morphological information with high spatial resolution and an unlimited field of view. Since October 2006 the VieCuri Medical Centre in Venlo has a CMR scanner at its disposal. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to analyse the impact of CMR imaging on diagnosis and treatment in daily practice in the setting of a medium-volume peripheral hospital. METHODS: All patients who underwent CMR imaging between October 2006 and November 2008 were included in this analysis. The medical history before and after the CMR scan, the application form for CMR imaging and the outcome of the scans were reviewed. CMR images, obtained using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system, were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: In 235 patients CMR imaging demonstrated one or more abnormalities, whereas CMR imaging did not identify any abnormalities in 148 patients. CMR imaging confirmed an expected finding in 166 cases, identified an unexpected condition in 69 cases, ruled out an expected finding in 59 cases and ruled out a suspected condition in 89 cases. Due to better insight into diagnosis, CMR imaging resulted in a change of treatment in 166 of the total of 383 CMR scans (43%). CONCLUSION: In a relevant number of cases CMR imaging leads to a change in the treatment of a patient, proving the value of CMR imaging as a diagnostic modality. Therefore, CMR imaging is an excellent opportunity for peripheral medical centres to improve efficiency and the standard of patient care. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:524-30.).
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has evolved over the last decade into an indispensable diagnostic instrument. CMR imaging noninvasively provides structural, functional and morphological information with high spatial resolution and an unlimited field of view. Since October 2006 the VieCuri Medical Centre in Venlo has a CMR scanner at its disposal. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to analyse the impact of CMR imaging on diagnosis and treatment in daily practice in the setting of a medium-volume peripheral hospital. METHODS: All patients who underwent CMR imaging between October 2006 and November 2008 were included in this analysis. The medical history before and after the CMR scan, the application form for CMR imaging and the outcome of the scans were reviewed. CMR images, obtained using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system, were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: In 235 patients CMR imaging demonstrated one or more abnormalities, whereas CMR imaging did not identify any abnormalities in 148 patients. CMR imaging confirmed an expected finding in 166 cases, identified an unexpected condition in 69 cases, ruled out an expected finding in 59 cases and ruled out a suspected condition in 89 cases. Due to better insight into diagnosis, CMR imaging resulted in a change of treatment in 166 of the total of 383 CMR scans (43%). CONCLUSION: In a relevant number of cases CMR imaging leads to a change in the treatment of a patient, proving the value of CMR imaging as a diagnostic modality. Therefore, CMR imaging is an excellent opportunity for peripheral medical centres to improve efficiency and the standard of patient care. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:524-30.).
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques; Cardiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Authors: Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Poon; Robert C Hendel; James C Carr; Nancy A Gerstad; Linda D Gillam; John McB Hodgson; Raymond J Kim; Christopher M Kramer; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Joseph V Messer; Rita F Redberg; Geoffrey D Rubin; John S Rumsfeld; Allen J Taylor; Wm Guy Weigold; Pamela K Woodard; Ralph G Brindis; Robert C Hendel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philippine Kiès; Marianne Bootsma; Jeroen Bax; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Lubna Choudhury; Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Kelly M Choi; Michael D Elliott; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-12-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher M Kramer; Jorg Barkhausen; Scott D Flamm; Raymond J Kim; Eike Nagel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: E E van der Wall; E J S Kröner; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 2.357