Literature DB >> 21113313

Concentric Needle Quantitative EMG of Pubovisceralis Muscle Group: Normative Data from Asymptomatic Nulliparous Women.

W Thomas Gregory1, Teresa Worstell, Amanda L Clark, Jau-Shin Lou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The muscles of the pelvic floor closest to the vaginal opening are subject to the greatest degree of stretch during vaginal childbirth. We aim to define normative quantitative EMG (QEMG) parameters for the pubovisceralis (PV) muscle in nulliparous women, and compare them to the external anal sphincter (EAS).
METHODS: In 31 asymptomatic nulliparous women, concentric Needle EMG of the PV and the EAS was performed. Multi-motor unit action potential (Multi-MUAP) and interference pattern (IP) algorithms were utilized to obtain QEMG parameters. We used paired t-tests to compare PV and EAS parameters.
RESULTS: The motor units for the PV were of greater duration (p < 0.002) and had more turns (p = 0.03) than the paired motor units in the EAS. The EAS demonstrated more turns/second (p = 0.02), greater activity (p = 0.01), and more short segments (p = 0.009) than the PV.
CONCLUSIONS: The PV has longer and more complex motor units than the EAS. This knowledge continues to improve our ability to detect neuropathic changes in this vulnerable muscle area following childbirth or in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. In addition, the PV muscle group appears less responsive to requests for increased neuromuscular activity than the EAS. This needs to be further evaluated, as it may be associated with understanding which portion of the muscle functionally shortens to maintain the closure of the levator hiatus.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113313      PMCID: PMC2990221          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181d56cad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of two commercial quantitative electromyographic algorithms with manual analysis.

Authors:  M B Bromberg; A G Smith; J Bauerle
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: normative data.

Authors:  S Podnar; D B Vodusek; E Stâlberg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Quantitative electromyographic analysis of levator ani and external anal sphincter muscles of nulliparous women.

Authors:  A C Weidner; D B Sanders; S D Nandedkar; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Anal sphincter electromyography: editing of sampled motor unit action potentials.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Amanda L Clark; Joshua Johnson; Kimberly Willis; Amy Stuyvesant; Jau-Shin Lou
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; S E Mathers; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern.

Authors:  D B Sanders; E V Stålberg; S D Nandedkar
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 7.  Quantitative motor unit potential analysis.

Authors:  E Stålberg; S D Nandedkar; D B Sanders; B Falck
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Setchell; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  R E Allen; G L Hosker; A R Smith; D W Warrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-09

10.  Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Jau-Shin Lou; Amy Stuyvesant; Amanda L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.