Literature DB >> 21113110

Operant sensation seeking in the mouse.

Christopher M Olsen1, Danny G Winder.   

Abstract

Operant methods are powerful behavioral tools for the study of motivated behavior. These 'self-administration' methods have been used extensively in drug addiction research due to their high construct validity. Operant studies provide researchers a tool for preclinical investigation of several aspects of the addiction process. For example, mechanisms of acute reinforcement (both drug and non-drug) can be tested using pharmacological or genetic tools to determine the ability of a molecular target to influence self-administration behavior. Additionally, drug or food seeking behaviors can be studied in the absence of the primary reinforcer, and the ability of pharmacological compounds to disrupt this process is a preclinical model for discovery of molecular targets and compounds that may be useful for the treatment of addiction. One problem with performing intravenous drug self-administration studies in the mouse is the technical difficulty of maintaining catheter patency. Attrition rates in these experiments are high and can reach 40% or higher. Another general problem with drug self-administration is discerning which pharmacologically-induced effects of the reinforcer produce specific behaviors. For example, measurement of the reinforcing and neurological effects of psychostimulants can be confounded by their psychomotor effects. Operant methods using food reinforcement can avoid these pitfalls, although their utility in studying drug addiction is limited by the fact that some manipulations that alter drug self-administration have a minimal impact on food self-administration. For example, mesolimbic dopamine lesion or knockout of the D1 dopamine receptor reduce cocaine self-administration without having a significant impact on food self-administration. Sensory stimuli have been described for their ability to support operant responding as primary reinforcers (i.e. not conditioned reinforcers). Auditory and visual stimuli are self-administered by several species, although surprisingly little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying this reinforcement. The operant sensation seeking (OSS) model is a robust model for obtaining sensory self-administration in the mouse, allowing the study of neural mechanisms important in sensory reinforcement. An additional advantage of OSS is the ability to screen mutant mice for differences in operant behavior that may be relevant to addiction. We have reported that dopamine D1 receptor knockout mice, previously shown to be deficient in psychostimulant self-administration, also fail to acquire OSS. This is a unique finding in that these mice are capable of learning an operant task when food is used as a reinforcer. While operant studies using food reinforcement can be useful in the study of general motivated behavior and the mechanisms underlying food reinforcement, as mentioned above, these studies are limited in their application to studying molecular mechanisms of drug addiction. Thus, there may be similar neural substrates mediating sensory and psychostimulant reinforcement that are distinct from food reinforcement, which would make OSS a particularly attractive model for the study of drug addiction processes. The degree of overlap between other molecular targets of OSS and drug reinforcers is unclear, but is a topic that we are currently pursuing. While some aspects of addiction such as resistance to extinction may be observed with OSS, we have found that escalation is not observed in this model. Interestingly, escalation of intake and some other aspects of addiction are observed with self-administration of sucrose. Thus, when non-drug operant procedures are desired to study addiction-related processes, food or sensory reinforcers can be chosen to best fit the particular question being asked. In conclusion, both food self-administration and OSS in the mouse have the advantage of not requiring an intravenous catheter, which allows a higher throughput means to study the effects of pharmacological or genetic manipulation of neural targets involved in motivation. While operant testing using food as a reinforcer is particularly useful in the study of the regulation of food intake, OSS is particularly apt for studying reinforcement mechanisms of sensory stimuli and may have broad applicability to novelty seeking and addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113110      PMCID: PMC3159589          DOI: 10.3791/2292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  29 in total

Review 1.  Brain circuitry and the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Peter W Kalivas; Krista McFarland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Environmental enrichment decreases responding for visual novelty.

Authors:  Mary E Cain; Thomas A Green; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstatement procedure.

Authors:  David H Epstein; Kenzie L Preston; Jane Stewart; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Pathways to relapse: the neurobiology of drug- and stress-induced relapse to drug-taking.

Authors:  J Stewart
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 5.  Critical assessment of how to study addiction and its treatment: human and non-human animal models.

Authors:  Charles P O'Brien; Eliot L Gardner
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

Authors:  J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Qualitative differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in morphine potentiation of brain stimulation reward and intravenous self-administration.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Jeanne O Pieper; Lindsey R Hamilton; Roy A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Differential responsiveness to cocaine in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  B A Rocha; L A Odom; B A Barron; R Ator; S A Wild; M J Forster
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Rewarding properties of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Katharina Blatter; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Impaired fear extinction learning and cortico-amygdala circuit abnormalities in a common genetic mouse strain.

Authors:  Kathryn Hefner; Nigel Whittle; Jaynann Juhasz; Maxine Norcross; Rose-Marie Karlsson; Lisa M Saksida; Timothy J Bussey; Nicolas Singewald; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  14 in total

1.  Discovery of 2-(2-benzoxazoyl amino)-4-aryl-5-cyanopyrimidine as negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu₅): from an artificial neural network virtual screen to an in vivo tool compound.

Authors:  Ralf Mueller; Eric S Dawson; Jens Meiler; Alice L Rodriguez; Brian A Chauder; Brittney S Bates; Andrew S Felts; Jeffrey P Lamb; Usha N Menon; Sataywan B Jadhav; Alexander S Kane; Carrie K Jones; Karen J Gregory; Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn; Christopher M Olsen; Danny G Winder; Kyle A Emmitte; Craig W Lindsley
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Endocannabinoid control of the insular-bed nucleus of the stria terminalis circuit regulates negative affective behavior associated with alcohol abstinence.

Authors:  Samuel W Centanni; Bridget D Morris; Joseph R Luchsinger; Gaurav Bedse; Tracy L Fetterly; Sachin Patel; Danny G Winder
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions.

Authors:  Christopher M Olsen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; T H Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Christopher M Olsen; Danny G Winder
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  BNST GluN2D-Containing NMDA Receptors Influence Anxiety- and Depressive-like Behaviors and ModulateCell-Specific Excitatory/Inhibitory Synaptic Balance.

Authors:  Gregory J Salimando; Minsuk Hyun; Kristen M Boyt; Danny G Winder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  (3-Cyano-5-fluorophenyl)biaryl negative allosteric modulators of mGlu(5): Discovery of a new tool compound with activity in the OSS mouse model of addiction.

Authors:  Craig W Lindsley; Brittney S Bates; Usha N Menon; Satyawan B Jadhav; Alexander S Kane; Carrie K Jones; Alice L Rodriguez; P Jeffrey Conn; Christopher M Olsen; Danny G Winder; Kyle A Emmitte
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.418

8.  α2A-Adrenergic Receptor Activation Decreases Parabrachial Nucleus Excitatory Drive onto BNST CRF Neurons and Reduces Their Activity In Vivo.

Authors:  Tracy L Fetterly; Aakash Basu; Brett P Nabit; Elias Awad; Kellie M Williford; Samuel W Centanni; Robert T Matthews; Yuval Silberman; Danny G Winder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dorsal BNST α2A-Adrenergic Receptors Produce HCN-Dependent Excitatory Actions That Initiate Anxiogenic Behaviors.

Authors:  Nicholas A Harris; Austin T Isaac; Anne Günther; Kevin Merkel; James Melchior; Michelle Xu; Eghosa Eguakun; Rafael Perez; Brett P Nabit; Stephanie Flavin; Ralf Gilsbach; Brian Shonesy; Lutz Hein; Ted Abel; Arnd Baumann; Robert Matthews; Samuel W Centanni; Danny G Winder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Operant sensation seeking requires metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5).

Authors:  Christopher M Olsen; Daniel S Childs; Gregg D Stanwood; Danny G Winder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.