Literature DB >> 21113056

Biased discordance of KRAS mutation detection in archived colorectal cancer specimens between the ARMS-Scorpion method and direct sequencing.

Hideaki Bando1, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Takayuki Yoshino, Motohiro Kojima, Naomi Ogasawara, Hiraku Fukushima, Atsushi Ochiai, Atsushi Ohtsu, Hiroyasu Esumi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The concordance of KRAS mutation detection between the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and direct sequencing was evaluated with clinically available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of metastatic colorectal cancers.
METHODS: Genomic DNA from 120 macrodissected specimens was examined by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and direct sequencing. DNA mixtures of wild-type and mutant KRAS genes were prepared from the peripheral blood and the SW620 human colon cancer cell line for the model experiments.
RESULTS: KRAS mutation was identified in 50 samples (41.7%) by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and 42 samples (35.0%) by direct sequencing. Discordance between the two methods was observed for samples with smaller amounts of amplifiable DNA. The sensitivity of direct sequencing was impaired by the decrease in template DNA and polymerase chain reaction cycles in the experimental models.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreased sensitivity of direct sequencing caused by insufficient polymerase chain reaction amplification resulted in biased discordance between direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion. Polymerase chain reaction conditions satisfactory for amplifying tens of haploid copies of genomic DNA to the saturation level might be necessary to ensure the robustness of the direct sequencing-based method employed for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen-derived DNA samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113056     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Degraded DNA may induce discordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastases.

Authors:  Yuka Kaneko; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Go Nakajima; Yuji Inoue; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical Evaluation of IntelliPlex™ KRAS G12/13 Mutation Kit for Detection of KRAS Mutations in Codon 12 and 13: A Novel Multiplex Approach.

Authors:  Chi-Long Chen; Chi-Kuan Chen; Chung-Liang Ho; Wei-Ming Chi; Chien-Hsuan Yeh; Shian-Pin Hu; Peter Friebe; Stuart Palmer; Chin-Shiou Huang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  KRAS mutations detected by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assays strongly correlate with therapeutic effect of cetuximab.

Authors:  H Bando; T Yoshino; K Tsuchihara; N Ogasawara; N Fuse; T Kojima; M Tahara; M Kojima; K Kaneko; T Doi; A Ochiai; H Esumi; A Ohtsu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Whole Exome Sequencing of Lacrimal Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Authors:  David W Sant; Wensi Tao; Matthew G Field; Daniel Pelaez; Ke Jin; Anthony Capobianco; Sander R Dubovy; David T Tse; Gaofeng Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Clinical association with KRAS.

Authors:  Xiao Yan Chang; Yan Wu; Yuan Li; Jing Wang; Jie Chen
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  Detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry - a sensitive, reliable, fast and cost-effective technique.

Authors:  Mark Kriegsmann; Norbert Arens; Volker Endris; Wilko Weichert; Jörg Kriegsmann
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.