Literature DB >> 21112898

Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic to mild heart failure: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction).

Cecilia Linde1, Stuart Mealing, Neil Hawkins, James Eaton, Ben Brown, Jean-Claude Daubert.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared with optimal medical therapy in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) II heart failure (HF) or NYHA I with previous HF symptoms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A proportion in state model with Monte Carlo simulation was developed to assess the costs, life years and quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) associated with CRT-ON and -OFF over a 10 year time period. Data from 262 patients in the European cohort of the REVERSE clinical trial (QRS ≥ 120 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%, CRT-ON, n = 180, CRT-OFF, n = 82) were used to model all-cause mortality, change in NYHA class and resource use. EQ-5D preference weights were taken from a previous cost-effectiveness model of CRT and unit costs from national UK databases. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% p.a. Extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Compared with CRT-OFF, 0.94 life years or 0.80 QALYs were gained in the CRT ON group at an additional cost of €11 455, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €14.278 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. At a threshold of €33 000 (£30 000) per QALY gained, the probability that CRT is cost-effective is 79.6%. Cardiac resynchronization therapy becomes cost effective after ∼4.5 years. Cardiac resynchronization therapy needs only to demonstrate a modest impact on all cause mortality (hazard ratio = 0.82) in order to demonstrate cost-effectiveness. The results are robust to changes in all other parameters.
CONCLUSION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a cost-effective intervention for patients with mildly symptomatic HF and for asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous HF symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112898     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Syed Yaseen Naqvi; Anas Jawaid; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

2.  Complement C3a predicts outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy of heart failure.

Authors:  Gábor Széplaki; András Mihály Boros; Szabolcs Szilágyi; István Osztheimer; Zsigmond Jenei; Annamária Kosztin; Klaudia Vivien Nagy; Júlia Karády; Levente Molnár; Tamás Tahin; Endre Zima; László Gellér; Zoltán Prohászka; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 3.  Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Clinical Management and Outcome.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Paola Battistini; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi; Cinzia Valzania; Cristian Martignani; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-02-12

4.  Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.

Authors:  Simon Modi; Andrew Krahn; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-10

5.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the MADIT-CRT trial.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Peter Veazie; William Jackson Hall; Hongwei Zhao; April Buttaccio; Kelly Thevenet-Morrison; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-22

6.  Use of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy - Change of Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Khang-Li Looi; Anthony Sl Tang; Sharad Agarwal
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

7.  Assessment of ventricular pacing in the setting of an institutional improvement program: insights into physiological pacing.

Authors:  Antoine Kossaify; Sylvana Zoghbi; Paul Milliez
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-08

8.  Exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with systematic device optimization vs. standard (non-systematic) optimization: a multinational economic evaluation.

Authors:  Kurt Banz; Peter Paul Delnoy; Jean Renaud Billuart
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-07-11

9.  REVERSE 5-year follow up: CRT impact persists.

Authors:  Mohamed ElMaghawry; Mahmoud Farouk
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2014-10-16

10.  Quantification of survival gain from cardiac resynchronization therapy: nonlinear growth with time, and greater gain in low-risk patients, make raw trial data an underestimate of real-world behavior.

Authors:  Judith A Finegold; Claire E Raphael; Wayne C Levy; Zachary Whinnett; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.