BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to investigate serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection duringpeginterferon (PEG-IFN) and entecavir (ETV) monotherapy. METHODS:HBsAg was quantified (Abbott ARCHITECT) at baseline and during antiviral therapy (weeks 12, 24, 36, 48) in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg-) positive patients treated with ETV (n=33) or PEG-IFN (n=61) and in HBeAg-negative patients treated with ETV (n=37) or PEG-IFN (n=69). RESULTS: Within the HBeAg-positive population, patients treated with PEG-IFN tended to have a steeper HBsAg decline than ETV-treated patients (mean decline 0.94 versus 0.38 log IU/ml at week 48, p=0.07 for comparison of the slope of HBsAg decline). The HBsAg decline was larger in those patients who became HBeAg negative, irrespective of the treatment regimen. A decline in HBsAg was confined to ETV-treated patients with elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, whereas HBsAg decline was not associated with baseline ALT in patients treated with PEG-IFN. Within the HBeAg-negative population, PEG-IFN induced a significant HBsAg decline, while HBsAg did not decrease in ETV-treated patients (0.56 versus -0.10 log IU/ml, p<0.001). Both in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, the decline in serum HBV DNA was larger in patients who received ETV as compared to patients treated with PEG-IFN. CONCLUSIONS: In HBeAg-positive patients, the decline in serum HBsAg is mainly confined to patients who clear HBeAg, by either PEG-IFN or ETV treatment. In HBeAg-negative patients, PEG-IFN therapy resulted in a significant reduction in HBsAg levels, whereas HBsAg did not decrease in ETV-treated patients. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to investigate serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection during peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and entecavir (ETV) monotherapy. METHODS: HBsAg was quantified (Abbott ARCHITECT) at baseline and during antiviral therapy (weeks 12, 24, 36, 48) in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg-) positive patients treated with ETV (n=33) or PEG-IFN (n=61) and in HBeAg-negative patients treated with ETV (n=37) or PEG-IFN (n=69). RESULTS: Within the HBeAg-positive population, patients treated with PEG-IFN tended to have a steeper HBsAg decline than ETV-treated patients (mean decline 0.94 versus 0.38 log IU/ml at week 48, p=0.07 for comparison of the slope of HBsAg decline). The HBsAg decline was larger in those patients who became HBeAg negative, irrespective of the treatment regimen. A decline in HBsAg was confined to ETV-treated patients with elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, whereas HBsAg decline was not associated with baseline ALT in patients treated with PEG-IFN. Within the HBeAg-negative population, PEG-IFN induced a significant HBsAg decline, while HBsAg did not decrease in ETV-treated patients (0.56 versus -0.10 log IU/ml, p<0.001). Both in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, the decline in serum HBV DNA was larger in patients who received ETV as compared to patients treated with PEG-IFN. CONCLUSIONS: In HBeAg-positive patients, the decline in serum HBsAg is mainly confined to patients who clear HBeAg, by either PEG-IFN or ETV treatment. In HBeAg-negative patients, PEG-IFN therapy resulted in a significant reduction in HBsAg levels, whereas HBsAg did not decrease in ETV-treated patients. Copyright Â
Authors: Robert E Lanford; Bernadette Guerra; Deborah Chavez; Luis Giavedoni; Vida L Hodara; Kathleen M Brasky; Abigail Fosdick; Christian R Frey; Jim Zheng; Grushenka Wolfgang; Randall L Halcomb; Daniel B Tumas Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Nagraj Mani; Andrew G Cole; Janet R Phelps; Andrzej Ardzinski; Kyle D Cobarrubias; Andrea Cuconati; Bruce D Dorsey; Ellen Evangelista; Kristi Fan; Fang Guo; Haitao Guo; Ju-Tao Guo; Troy O Harasym; Salam Kadhim; Steven G Kultgen; Amy C H Lee; Alice H L Li; Quanxin Long; Sara A Majeski; Richeng Mao; Kevin D McClintock; Stephen P Reid; Rene Rijnbrand; Nicholas M Snead; Holly M Micolochick Steuer; Kim Stever; Sunny Tang; Xiaohe Wang; Qiong Zhao; Michael J Sofia Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 5.191