Jessica Tyrrell1, Sandra Campbell, Alison Curnow. 1. Clinical Photobiology, European Centre for Environment and Human Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3HD, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is a successful treatment for non-melanoma skin cancers in the UK. Monitoring the photobleaching of the photosensitiser, protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) during treatment has been demonstrated to indicate the efficacy of the treatment. This study investigated photobleaching during light irradiation. METHODS: A validated non-invasive fluorescence imaging system was utilised to monitor changes in PpIX fluorescence during light irradiation. Fifty patients were recruited to this study, with patients monitored before, during (forty patients at the half way stage and ten at regular intervals in the initial phase of treatment) and after light irradiation. RESULTS: Phased PpIX photobleaching was observed during light irradiation with a significantly greater change (P<0.001) in PpIX photobleaching during the first half of light treatment. Within the ten patients monitored periodically the phased photobleaching observed fitted a double exponential decay curve (r(2)=0.99, P<0.005) suggesting a rapid initial phase of reaction when the light treatment was commenced. CONCLUSIONS: Photobleaching was observed to be maximal in the initial phases of treatment, however photobleaching of PpIX continued until the completion of light treatment indicating that current clinical protocols for MAL-PDT do not over-treat the lesion with light.
BACKGROUND:Methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is a successful treatment for non-melanoma skin cancers in the UK. Monitoring the photobleaching of the photosensitiser, protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) during treatment has been demonstrated to indicate the efficacy of the treatment. This study investigated photobleaching during light irradiation. METHODS: A validated non-invasive fluorescence imaging system was utilised to monitor changes in PpIX fluorescence during light irradiation. Fifty patients were recruited to this study, with patients monitored before, during (forty patients at the half way stage and ten at regular intervals in the initial phase of treatment) and after light irradiation. RESULTS: Phased PpIX photobleaching was observed during light irradiation with a significantly greater change (P<0.001) in PpIX photobleaching during the first half of light treatment. Within the ten patients monitored periodically the phased photobleaching observed fitted a double exponential decay curve (r(2)=0.99, P<0.005) suggesting a rapid initial phase of reaction when the light treatment was commenced. CONCLUSIONS: Photobleaching was observed to be maximal in the initial phases of treatment, however photobleaching of PpIX continued until the completion of light treatment indicating that current clinical protocols for MAL-PDT do not over-treat the lesion with light.
Authors: S C Kanick; S C Davis; Y Zhao; K L Sheehan; T Hasan; E V Maytin; B W Pogue; M S Chapman Journal: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.631