| Literature DB >> 21112269 |
Jacques Chanliau1, Michèle Kessler.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is as least as good as hemodialysis (HD) for the treatment of end stage kidney disease, considering morbidity and mortality, and better for quality of life. The best result is obtained when the patient can benefit of the sequential treatment, PD first and then HD if necessary. Furthermore, the cost of a patient treated by PD is less than the cost of the same patient treated by HD, at least in developed countries. But, all around the word, the rate of usage of PD don't grow, or decline. One can expect that, as no medical reason can explain this, the cause is economic. Multiple economics aspects and expenses posts for DP are analyzed, as the results of some financial decisions taken in one country or the other, keeping in mind the French system or reimbursement. We conclude that economic incitations may help for the development of PD, if they don't penalize one of the partners (insurance, clinics, doctors of patients), and if in the same time there is an improvement of the formation and information of doctors and patient.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21112269 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2010.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephrol Ther ISSN: 1769-7255 Impact factor: 0.722