Literature DB >> 21112217

Repeat mediastinoscopy in all its indications: experience with 96 patients and 101 procedures.

Sergi Call1, Ramon Rami-Porta, Carme Obiols, Mireia Serra-Mitjans, Guadalupe Gonzalez-Pont, Romà Bastús-Piulats, Salvador Quintana, Jose Belda-Sanchis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of repeat mediastinoscopy (reMS) in all its indications, and to analyse survival in the group of patients who underwent induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for pathologically proven stage III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: From July 1992 to February 2009, 96 patients (87 men; median age: 61.3 years), underwent 101 reMSs (five patients required a second reMS) for the following indications: restaging after induction therapy for pathologically proven N2 disease (84 cases), inadequate first mediastinoscopy (five), metachronous second primary (six) and recurrent lung cancer (six). Patients with N2-NSCLC, who had received induction therapy and had positive reMS, underwent definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Patients in whom reMS was negative underwent thoracotomy for lung resection and systematic nodal dissection (SND). SND was considered the gold standard to compare the negative results of reMS. Pathologic findings were reviewed and staging values were calculated using the standard formulas. Follow-up data were completed in January 2010, and survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: In the group of reMS for restaging after induction therapy, the staging values were: sensitivity 0.74, specificity 1, positive predictive value 1, negative predictive value 0.79 and diagnostic accuracy 0.87. We also determined the diagnostic value of this technique according to the type of induction treatment. In terms of accuracy, no statistically significant differences were found. Median survival time in patients with true negative reMS was 51.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 0-112), and in the combined group of patients with positive and false-negative reMS, median survival time was 11 months (95% CI 7.6-14.1) (p=0.0001). In the group of miscellaneous indications, all staging values were 1.
CONCLUSION: ReMS is feasible in all the indications described. After induction therapy, it is a useful procedure to select patients for lung resection with high accuracy, independently of the induction treatment used or the intensity of the first mediastinoscopy. The persistence of lymph node involvement after induction therapy has a poor prognosis. Therefore, techniques providing cytohistological evidence of nodal downstaging are advisable to avoid unnecessary thoracotomies.
Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112217     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  13 in total

1.  eComment. Should persistent N2/N3 non-small cell lung cancer be treated by surgery?

Authors:  Alessandro Baisi; Federico Raveglia; Matilde De Simone; Ugo Cioffi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12

2.  Surgery on unfavourable persistent N2/N3 non-small-cell lung cancer after trimodal therapy: do the results justify the risk?

Authors:  Volker Steger; Tobias Walker; Migdat Mustafi; Karoline Lehrach; Thomas Kyriss; Stefanie Veit; Godehard Friedel; Thorsten Walles
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-20

3.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy after induction therapy-a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Sameer A Hirji; Asishana Osho; Stafford S Balderson; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-12-21

Review 4.  Present indications of surgical exploration of the mediastinum.

Authors:  Sergi Call; Carme Obiols; Ramon Rami-Porta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Advances in multimodal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sara Montemuiño Muñiz; Soraya Marcos Sánchez; Julia Calzas Rodríguez; Beatriz Losada Vila; Esther Llorente Herrero; María Dolores Hisado Díaz; Victoria Valeri-Busto González; Begoña Taboada Valladares; Blanca Vaquero Barrón; Francisco José Marcos Jimenez; Sergio Amor Alonso; Javier Moradiellos; Núria Rodríguez de Dios; Felipe Couñago
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-16

6.  The utility of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration in lymphoma.

Authors:  Fayez Kheir; Ahmad Itani; Omar Assasa; Abdul Hamid Alraiyes
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration an effective diagnostic procedure in restaging of non-small cell lung cancer patients?

Authors:  Erdoğan Cetinkaya; Ozan Usluer; Aydın Yılmaz; Nuri Tutar; Ertan Çam; Mehmet Akif Özgül; Nilgün Yılmaz Demirci
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Transbronchial and transesophageal fine-needle aspiration using a single ultrasound bronchoscope in the diagnosis of locoregional recurrence of surgically-treated lung cancer.

Authors:  José Sanz-Santos; Pere Serra; Felipe Andreo; Mohamed Torky; Carmen Centeno; Teresa Morán; Enric Carcereny; Esther Fernández; Samuel García-Reina; Juan Ruiz-Manzano
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Prognostic significance of pathological complete response in non-small cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Mustafa Akyıl; Çağatay Tezel; Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl; Deniz Gürer; Serdar Evman; Levent Alpay; Volkan Baysungur; İrfan Yalçınkaya
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 0.332

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul E Van Schil; Bram Balduyck; Michèle De Waele; Jeroen M Hendriks; Marjan Hertoghs; Patrick Lauwers
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.