Literature DB >> 21112187

Follow-up of subjects with suspected pre-psychotic state in Taiwan.

Chen-Chung Liu1, Meng-Chuan Lai, Chih-Min Liu, Yen-Nan Chiu, Ming H Hsieh, Tzung-Jeng Hwang, Yi-Ling Chien, Wei J Chen, Mau-Sun Hua, Ping-Chuan Hsiung, Ya-Chuan Huang, Hai-Gwo Hwu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of subjects with suspected pre-psychotic state in Taiwan.
METHODS: A prospective clinical observation was performed on subjects recruited by referrals from a community-based population. Three pre-psychotic risk groups were established by means of clinical interviews: an ultra-high risk group (UHR; 59 subjects), an intermediate-risk group (IRG; 46 subjects), and a marginal-risk group (MRG; 48 subjects). Also recruited were 60 subjects with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and 144 normal controls (NC group). All subjects were aged 16 to 32 years.
RESULTS: Of the 59 UHR subjects, 21 (35.6%) converted to FEP, including 15 with schizophrenia (6 had relatively brief positive yet persistent prominent negative symptoms), 2 with schizophreniform disorder, 1 with schizoaffective disorder, 2 with brief psychotic disorder, and 1 with bipolar disorder. The cumulative±SE rate of conversion to psychosis was 21.7%±5.4% at 6 months, 28.2%±6.2% at 12 months, 30.4%±6.4% at 18 months, and 33.3%±6.8% at 24 months. The UHR subjects who converted had a higher rate of initial antipsychotic use than those who did not convert. Only half of the IRG and two-thirds of the MRG subjects received follow-up, and none of them developed FEP.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results lent support to both sides of the current debate regarding establishing a new diagnostic category of "psychosis risk syndrome." The divergent trajectories of the UHR subjects deserve more clinical attention, especially with regard to the use of antipsychotics and the presence of a group with prominent negative symptoms.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112187     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

1.  At risk or not at risk? A meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marco Cappucciati; Grazia Rutigliano; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Ilaria Bonoldi; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Jean Addington; Diana Perkins; Scott W Woods; Thomas H McGlashan; Jimmy Lee; Joachim Klosterkötter; Alison R Yung; Philip McGuire
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Severity of thought disorder predicts psychosis in persons at clinical high-risk.

Authors:  Diana O Perkins; Clark D Jeffries; Barbara A Cornblatt; Scott W Woods; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert Heinssen; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Predictive validity of conversion from the clinical high risk syndrome to frank psychosis.

Authors:  Laura A Yoviene Sykes; Maria Ferrara; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Diana O Perkins; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan; Kristen A Woodberry; Albert R Powers; Allison N Ponce; John D Cahill; Jessica M Pollard; Vinod H Srihari; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Can We Predict Psychosis Outside the Clinical High-Risk State? A Systematic Review of Non-Psychotic Risk Syndromes for Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Tae Young Lee; Junhee Lee; Minah Kim; Eugenie Choe; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  The Dark Side of the Moon: Meta-analytical Impact of Recruitment Strategies on Risk Enrichment in the Clinical High Risk State for Psychosis.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Marco Cappucciati; Grazia Rutigliano; Ilaria Bonoldi; Daniel Stahl; Stephan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Scott W Woods; Thomas McGlashan; Jimmy Lee; Joachim Klosterkötter; Alison R Yung; Philip McGuire
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Negative Prognostic Effect of Baseline Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): Is Pre-Test Risk Enrichment the Hidden Culprit?

Authors:  Andrea Raballo; Michele Poletti; Antonio Preti
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.