Literature DB >> 21112055

Appropriate use criteria for carotid intima media thickness testing.

.   

Abstract

The Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, in collaboration with the International Atherosclerosis Society, conducted an appropriate use review of common clinical scenarios where carotid intima media thickness testing may be considered. The indications for this review were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Thirty-three clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate technical panel on a scale of 1-9 to designate appropriate use, inappropriate use, or uncertain use. Clinical scenarios included the clinical application of CIMT for risk assessment in the absence of known coronary heart disease, risk assessment in patients with known CHD, and serial CIMT imaging for monitoring of CHD risk status. Appropriate indications were largely clustered within the detection of CHD risk among intermediate risk patients, metabolic syndrome, and older patients. There were no appropriate indications for serial testing. Inappropriate indications generally were seen among use of CIMT in low risk patients, and high risk patients. This document is intended to provide a practical guide to clinicians and promote optimal use of testing which includes both the avoidance of under and over testing. It is intended that these criteria will be updated as the evidence on CIMT imaging continues to evolve. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112055     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  16 in total

1.  Atherosclerosis: Should we use CIMT testing? New insights from Framingham.

Authors:  Matthew Budoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Ultrasound imaging of carotid intima-media thickness: an office-based tool to assist physicians in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Authors:  Eric Y Yang; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Can ultrasonographic measurement of carotid intima-media thickness predict hypotension after induction of general anesthesia?

Authors:  Ayhan Kaydu; Dilek Duman Güven; Erhan Gökcek
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Evaluation of carotid intima-media thickness, a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Hasan Cece; Abdulkadir Yetisgin; Mahmut Abuhandan; Sema Yildiz; Mustafa Calik; Omer Karakas; Ekrem Karakas; Akin Iscan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25

Review 5.  PET imaging of aortic atherosclerosis: Is combined imaging of plaque anatomy and function an amaranthine quest or conceivable reality?

Authors:  Gary R Small; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Can the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and carotis intima media thickness (CIMT) be new early stage markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Tolga Kurt; Ahmet Temiz; Ferhat Gokmen; Gurhan Adam; Sedat Ozcan; Ersan Ozbudak; Mustafa Sacar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011.

Authors:  P-J Touboul; M G Hennerici; S Meairs; H Adams; P Amarenco; N Bornstein; L Csiba; M Desvarieux; S Ebrahim; R Hernandez Hernandez; M Jaff; S Kownator; T Naqvi; P Prati; T Rundek; M Sitzer; U Schminke; J-C Tardif; A Taylor; E Vicaut; K S Woo
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 8.  Carotid artery stenosis screening: where are we now?

Authors:  Rebecca Mortimer; Subramanian Nachiappan; David C Howlett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Common carotid intima-media thickness does not add to Framingham risk score in individuals with diabetes mellitus: the USE-IMT initiative.

Authors:  H M den Ruijter; S A E Peters; K A Groenewegen; T J Anderson; A R Britton; J M Dekker; G Engström; M J Eijkemans; G W Evans; J de Graaf; D E Grobbee; B Hedblad; A Hofman; S Holewijn; A Ikeda; M Kavousi; K Kitagawa; A Kitamura; H Koffijberg; M A Ikram; E M Lonn; M W Lorenz; E B Mathiesen; G Nijpels; S Okazaki; D H O'Leary; J F Polak; J F Price; C Robertson; C M Rembold; M Rosvall; T Rundek; J T Salonen; M Sitzer; C D A Stehouwer; J C Witteman; K G Moons; M L Bots
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Carotid intima-media thickness: Current evidence, practices, and Indian experience.

Authors:  Ravi R Kasliwal; Manish Bansal; Devang Desai; Maya Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.