BACKGROUND: Pharmacy workload is a modifiable work system factor believed to affect both medication safety outcomes and employee outcomes, such as job satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to measure the effect of workload on safety and employee outcomes in 2 pediatric hospitals and to do so using a novel approach to pharmacy workload measurement. METHODS: Rather than measuring prescription volume or other similar indicators, this study measured the type and intensity of mental demands experienced during the medication dispensing tasks. The effects of external (interruptions, divided attention, and rushing) and internal (concentration and effort) task demands on perceived medication error likelihood, adverse drug event likelihood, job dissatisfaction, and burnout were statistically estimated using multiple linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians reported high levels of external and internal mental demands during dispensing. The study supported the hypothesis that external demands (interruptions, divided attention, and rushing) negatively impacted medication safety and employee well-being outcomes. However, as hypothesized, increasing levels of internal demands (concentration and effort) were not associated with greater perceived likelihood of error, adverse drug events, or burnout and even had a positive effect on job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Replicating a prior study in nursing, this study shows that new conceptualizations and measures of workload can generate important new findings about both detrimental and beneficial effects of workload on patient safety and employee well-being. This study discusses what those findings imply for policy, management, and design concerning automation, cognition, and staffing.
BACKGROUND: Pharmacy workload is a modifiable work system factor believed to affect both medication safety outcomes and employee outcomes, such as job satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to measure the effect of workload on safety and employee outcomes in 2 pediatric hospitals and to do so using a novel approach to pharmacy workload measurement. METHODS: Rather than measuring prescription volume or other similar indicators, this study measured the type and intensity of mental demands experienced during the medication dispensing tasks. The effects of external (interruptions, divided attention, and rushing) and internal (concentration and effort) task demands on perceived medication error likelihood, adverse drug event likelihood, job dissatisfaction, and burnout were statistically estimated using multiple linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians reported high levels of external and internal mental demands during dispensing. The study supported the hypothesis that external demands (interruptions, divided attention, and rushing) negatively impacted medication safety and employee well-being outcomes. However, as hypothesized, increasing levels of internal demands (concentration and effort) were not associated with greater perceived likelihood of error, adverse drug events, or burnout and even had a positive effect on job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Replicating a prior study in nursing, this study shows that new conceptualizations and measures of workload can generate important new findings about both detrimental and beneficial effects of workload on patient safety and employee well-being. This study discusses what those findings imply for policy, management, and design concerning automation, cognition, and staffing.
Authors: Grant H Skrepnek; Edward P Armstrong; Daniel C Malone; Jacob Abarca; John E Murphy; Amy J Grizzle; Rick A Rehfeld; Raymond L Woosley Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Date: 2006 Mar-Apr
Authors: Jennifer L Cina; Tejal K Gandhi; William Churchill; John Fanikos; Michelle McCrea; Patricia Mitton; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Erica Featherstone; Carol Keohane; David W Bates; Eric G Poon Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2006-02
Authors: Brian J Carnahan; Saeed Maghsoodloo; Elizabeth A Flynn; Kenneth N Barker Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Daniel C Malone; Jacob Abarca; Grant H Skrepnek; John E Murphy; Edward P Armstrong; Amy J Grizzle; Rick A Rehfeld; Raymond L Woosley Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Richard J Holden; Matthew C Scanlon; Neal R Patel; Rainu Kaushal; Kamisha Hamilton Escoto; Roger L Brown; Samuel J Alper; Judi M Arnold; Theresa M Shalaby; Kathleen Murkowski; Ben-Tzion Karsh Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Annette Scheid; Jochen Profit; Tait Shanafelt; Mickey Trockel; Kathryn C Adair; J Bryan Sexton; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck Journal: Rev Hum Factors Ergon Date: 2013-09-01