Literature DB >> 21111111

A simplified technique for nerve-sparing type III radical hysterectomy: by reorganizing their surgical sequence, surgeons could more easily identify key nerves.

Kittipat Charoenkwan1.   

Abstract

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was developed in an attempt to minimize complications, including bladder, colorectal, and sexual dysfunction which are associated with disruption of the pelvic autonomic nerves during resection of the parametrium. In this article, the author proposes a simple, effective technique for identification and preservation of the pelvic nerves during type III radical hysterectomy. The essential technical considerations include the sequential approach to parametrial resection, starting from the posterior part, the direct visualization of the main nerve trunks at all sites during parametrial resection, and the avoidance of direct manipulation and unnecessary dissection of the nerves. Operative outcomes of 22 patients with cervical or uterine cancer who underwent type III radical hysterectomy from August 2008 to March 2010 were reviewed. Comparing with the earlier method performed at the author's institution, the present technique was associated with an increased proportion of patients who had a postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) under 50 mL at postoperative day 7 (55% vs 27%) and a shorter median duration before this PVR was reached (7 days vs 9 days). The systematic approach proposed in this article would make the nerve-sparing technique for radical hysterectomy more straightforward and applicable to various settings. A thorough understanding of anatomy and adequate surgical skills are always vital components of successful nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Improved Intraoperative Visualization of Nerves through a Myelin-Binding Fluorophore and Dual-Mode Laparoscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Victoria E Cotero; Simon Y Kimm; Tiberiu M Siclovan; Rong Zhang; Evgenia M Kim; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Tatsuo Gondo; Peter T Scardino; Siavash Yazdanfar; Vincent P Laudone; Cristina A Tan Hehir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark.

Authors:  Yuqin Zhang; Tingyan Shi; Sheng Yin; Sining Ma; Di Shi; Jun Guan; Libing Xiang; Yang Liu; Yulan Ren; Deyan Tan; Rongyu Zang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  The Annual Meeting of the Thai Gynecologic Cancer Society 2019: Meeting report.

Authors:  Kittipat Charoenkwan; Jatupol Srisomboon
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Predicting factors for resumption of spontaneous voiding following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Chalaithorn Nantasupha; Kittipat Charoenkwan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Anatomy of the vesicovaginal fascia and its relation to branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus.

Authors:  Douglas Stupart; Kylie Pickles; Chris Briggs
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.409

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.