Literature DB >> 21111092

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the cooper center longitudinal study.

Carrie E Finley1, Carolyn E Barlow, Thomas L Halton, William L Haskell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research examining the relationships among glycemic index, glycemic load, and the metabolic syndrome has resulted in inconsistent findings. The objective of this study was to examine whether glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with prevalent metabolic syndrome and its components after adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness, an objective measure of physical activity habitus.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS/
SETTING: Women (n=1,775) and men (n=9,137) who completed a comprehensive medical examination between October 1987 and March 1999, including maximal treadmill exercise test and 3-day dietary records at the Cooper Clinic, Dallas, TX. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Metabolic syndrome and its components, defined by the revised Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate sex-specific odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the associations among glycemic index, glycemic load, and prevalent metabolic syndrome and its components, while adjusting for potential confounding variables.
RESULTS: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 24% in men and 9% in women. A positive association across quintiles of glycemic index and metabolic syndrome, elevated triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in men was observed in the fully adjusted model (P for trend<0.05). In women, glycemic index was positively associated with large waist girth, low HDL-C, and elevated triglycerides (P for trend<0.05 for all) after multivariate adjustment including cardiorespiratory fitness. Glycemic load was positively associated with elevated triglycerides and low HDL-C (P for trend<0.0001) and inversely associated with prevalence of large waist girth and elevated glucose (P for trend<0.0001) in men. Among women, glycemic load was positively associated with elevated triglycerides (P for trend=0.04) and low HDL-C (P for trend<0.0001) in the multivariate model including cardiorespiratory fitness.
CONCLUSIONS: A lifestyle that includes a low glycemic diet can improve metabolic risk profiles in men and women. Prospective studies examining glycemic index, glycemic load, and metabolic syndrome that control for cardiorespiratory fitness are needed.
Copyright © 2010 American Dietetic Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111092     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  11 in total

1.  Reduction of dietary glycaemic load modifies the expression of microRNA potentially associated with energy balance and cancer pathways in pre-menopausal women.

Authors:  Susan E McCann; Song Liu; Dan Wang; Jie Shen; Qiang Hu; Chi-Chen Hong; Vicky A Newman; Hua Zhao
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  The relationship between carbohydrate quality and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: challenges of glycemic index and glycemic load.

Authors:  Mariane de Mello Fontanelli; Cristiane Hermes Sales; Antonio Augusto Ferreira Carioca; Dirce Maria Marchioni; Regina Mara Fisberg
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Decreases in dietary glycemic index are related to weight loss among individuals following therapeutic diets for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; David J A Jenkins; Neal D Barnard; Joshua Cohen; Lise Gloede; Amber A Green
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Dietary glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrates on the risk of primary liver cancer among Chinese women and men.

Authors:  E Vogtmann; H L Li; X O Shu; W H Chow; B T Ji; H Cai; J Gao; W Zhang; Y T Gao; W Zheng; Y B Xiang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Dietary patterns and physical activity in the metabolically (un)healthy obese: the Dutch Lifelines cohort study.

Authors:  Sandra N Slagter; Eva Corpeleijn; Melanie M van der Klauw; Anna Sijtsma; Linda G Swart-Busscher; Corine W M Perenboom; Jeanne H M de Vries; Edith J M Feskens; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Daan Kromhout; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  High or low glycemic index (GI) meals at dinner results in greater postprandial glycemia compared with breakfast: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sumanto Haldar; Leonie Egli; Carlos Antonio De Castro; Shia Lyn Tay; Melvin Xu Nian Koh; Christian Darimont; Katherine Mace; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  Carbohydrate restriction for diabetes: rediscovering centuries-old wisdom.

Authors:  Belinda S Lennerz; Andrew P Koutnik; Svetlana Azova; Joseph I Wolfsdorf; David S Ludwig
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Dietary Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Are Not Associated with the Metabolic Syndrome in Lebanese Healthy Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Cecile Borgi; Mandy Taktouk; Mona Nasrallah; Hussain Isma'eel; Hani Tamim; Lara Nasreddine
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Glycemic index, glycemic load, and metabolic syndrome in Mexican adolescents: a cross-sectional study from the NHNS-2012.

Authors:  Itandehui Castro-Quezada; Salomón Angulo-Estrada; Almudena Sánchez-Villegas; María Dolores Ruiz-López; Reyes Artacho; Lluís Serra-Majem; Teresa Shamah-Levy
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2017-05-25

10.  Household-specific physical activity levels and energy intakes according to the presence of metabolic syndrome in Korean young adults: Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey 2016-2018.

Authors:  Young-Jun Lee; Yeon-Hee Park; Jung-Woo Lee; Eun-Sook Sung; Hyun-Seob Lee; Jonghoon Park
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.